Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

I'm on the fence about whether or not a business must take cash. on the one hand, its their business and they can do what they want. on the other, cash is legal tender, and i don't think it should be denied as payment. i only ask because a few cities are starting to address it through legislation, and they want the businesses to take cash. i rarely find myself in agreement with government faggots.

I'm on the fence about whether or not a business must take cash. on the one hand, its their business and they can do what they want. on the other, cash is legal tender, and i don't think it should be denied as payment. i only ask because a few cities are starting to address it through legislation, and they want the businesses to take cash. i rarely find myself in agreement with government faggots.

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 9 pts

All our money should be digital. That way it will be easier to punish us for saying/thinking/eating/reading/doing/praying/wanting the wrong things.

[–] • 1 pt

Exactly ! It's always about control

[–] • 7 pts

I would prefer a physical currency that has and actual backing like silver or gold vs the Fiat system we have now.

[–] • 5 pts

Cash is king.... and untraceable. You want the feds to track your every dime?

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Thats why i don't understand why city govt is trying to force businesses to take cash. Its going on in NY, and CA.

[–] • 2 pts

Step 1: force business to take cash

Step 2: ban physical cash and only allow digital currency or electronic payment.

Step 3: ?????

Step 4: Rule the world.

[–] • 1 pt

Finally someone who understands.

[–] • 1 pt

Step 3: ?????

The step with the question marks is always "jews". Adding that word in makes all of these step memes completely understandable.

Let's take South Park's example:

Step 1: collect underpants (from children mind you) Step 2: ???? jews Step 3: profit

Doesn't that all make sense now?

[–] • 0 pt

digital currency leads to a required on line presence and a positive association with that currency, preface to the mark of the Beast.

When they can turn off your identity, ...

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

Cash is legal tender for debts. The debt part is the key. In a supermarket you exchange money for goods. The sale either happens or it doesn't. At no point is there a debt. On the other hand if you go to a restaurant, you eat and are presented with the bill, they will have a hard time not taking your cash because you've already consumed the product.

[–] • 3 pts

legal tender for all debts public and private

That used to mean something. One more thing (((they))) subverted.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

I refuse to frequent places that don't accept real money. It says right on the money that it's good for ALL debts, public and private.

[–] • 0 pt

They have to accept cash once you owe then money, but they won't give you the product until you pay with non-cash. They can't be forced to do business with you.

[–] • 1 pt

One of the local Thai places gives a 10% discount for paying in cash. I am very happy to do the 7min walk to go and pickup and pay in cash. Uber eats takes 30% in Australia. If you really like your local shop then stop being lazy and go for a walk to pickup your food.

[–] • 1 pt

All to distract you from the real issue, that federal reserve notes are forced on us, and real money is outlawed.

[–] • 0 pt

I am of the mindset that businesses can choose which forms of payment to accept.

Starting small, let's compare, say visa and amex. Amex charges higher fees for transaction processing than visa in many instances, so a business should be able to accept one and not the other.

Taking this a step further in regards to cash, a spiteful customer may pay a large bill in all pennies, something both parties know will take time to count and deposit, so a business should also be able to say no to a bag full of pennies.

Once you apply the two above scenarios, it becomes clear that a business can and should be able to accept or deny payment depending on the source, as long as they provide other, easily accessible means to pay. This last part is where you may have an argument, but it would need to be extreme ("we're a gas station in Vermont that only accepts Indian Rupees LOL")

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

I am of the mindset that businesses can choose which forms of payment to accept.

Ever heard of monopoly's? Example: Comcast starts a payment system, everyone loves it because it is absolutely free to transact both parties. Now, 5 years down the pipe, Comcast uses your payment data to advertisers, they know all the shit you buy. Comcast Pay(tm) now rules the businesses, all competition is GONE. Now (((advertisers))) become picky and snoop on your transactions. (((They))) particularly do not like yourself buying a firearm or ammunition, or donating to a political cause, maybe even purchasing from their competition. They will shekel-goblin your ass on fee's or just shut you down. Now good luck buying food because everyone uses Comcast Pay(tm). Unless you pay the jew toll.

Happened to social media 20 yrs ago, the service isn't truely free. If Fedcoin goes live and all physical is useless, don't come to me when this shit happens.

[–] • 0 pt

Then bring a Monopoly suit if you feel what the company is doing in your "what-if" violates those laws.

I can think of only a few scenarios where using the government to take choices away from businesses owners to "help" us worked as intended. In almost every case, it simply consolidates even more power in the hands of politicians.

[–] • 0 pt

A business should be able to choose what they accept as payment. I would personally encourage any or all: cash, credit, crypto, precious metals, barter..........

It is exceedingly sad that the banking system is so corrupt.

[–] • 0 pt

A business can do as they choose. If you don't like it, don't buy from them.

Load more (7 replies)