Yes, if they took a dna sample dumbass.
I assume scientists would know how to do that.
Organic is a marketing scam. There are relatively few genetically modofied foods. Corn, canola, soy, (beet) sugar, a couple varieties of apples, some mangoes, some papaya, some pineapple...I mean the list is getting longer, but a lot of those things become ingredients in heavily processed foods. Fresh produce is relatively "safe".
In my family we buy mostly very high quality food, but will go to the food pantry and accept some things we wouldnt waste our money on. Most meals we eat are made from scratch using VERY local ingredients...a lot from our property.
I'd like to see this. And good point farmers got in trouble because the gmo shit was blowing onto their fields..
My question would be can it be proven that non gmo is healthier would kid a eating a hippie organic diet be better off then kid b eating same veggies and fruit but had gmo or pesticides what ever the hippies hate most.
The problem with GMOs is that they only use it to make plants more resistant to herbacides. So they can soak the fields in round-up basically. Traces of round up wind up in the food. From what I've heard Monsanto is fighting hard to keep the regulators from admitting that round up can cause cancer. GMO isn't all bad, it's how we get insulin.
Any study would be self selecting of too many other character traits in my opinion.
Concious eating choices are often mirroring conscious acts in other areas.
(post is archived)