Sanskrit was the language of the Aryans. Sanskrit is not Sumerian. The Hindus got their language and religion from the Aryans who conquered India (as in Indus Valley civilization, Indo-Aryans). Try not to be an absolute moron. Next you'll tell me Buddha wasn't Aryan. LOL
I’m sure you have legitimate sources for any of this?
The original Sumerians were White Europeans who came from "Aratta" (to the north), they then mixed with the Dilmun migrants of the east, producing a populace that was partially made up of heterogenous hybrids. Those hybrids were then bred closer and closer to European through repeated European admixture over thousands upon thousands of generations.
That is why when you look at a genetic plot graph, MENA appear to be closely related to Europeans, but further towards Africans & Australoids. They are a mixed multitude. The name "arab" is from "ereb" meaning "mixed" - https://biblehub.com/hebrew/6154.htm This is also why MENA are classed as "Caucasoid," and have the Caucasoid skull shape.
MENA of course would prefer that people do not see them in this manner, they would much prefer people assume that they were always like that ever since the "Out of Africa" stuff that Jews like to push.
I like you man, but he isn't wrong about Sanskrit or the Buddha.
Sanskrit language, (from Sanskrit saṃskṛta, “adorned, cultivated, purified”), an Old Indo-Aryan language in which the most ancient documents are the Vedas, composed in what is called Vedic Sanskrit.
Buddha was from the Saka Clan, was born in Nepal. Not India. Siddhartha Gautama c. 563 BCE or 480 BCE Lumbini, Shakya Republic (present-day Nepal) (according to Buddhist tradition) -The Buddha was born into an aristocratic family in the Shakya clan -The Saka, Śaka, Shaka, Śāka or Sacae (Old Persian: 𐎿𐎣𐎠 Sakā; Kharosthi: 𐨯𐨐 Saka; Brahmi: Gupta allahabad sh.svg Gupta allahabad k.svg, Śaka; Sanskrit: शक, शाक, Śaka, Śāka; Ancient Greek: Σάκαι, Sákai; Latin: Sacae; Chinese: 塞, old *Sək, mod. Sāi; Ancient Egyptian: 𓋴𓎝𓎡𓈉, 𓐠𓎼𓈉 sk, sꜣg) were a group of nomadic Iranian peoples
So that source is from Britannica. Here’s what Britannica says about Indo-Aryan:
Indo-Aryan languages, or Indic languages, Major subgroup of the Indo-Iranian language family. Indo-Aryan languages are spoken by more than 800 million people, principally in India, Nepal, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka. The Old Indo-Aryan period is represented by Sanskrit. Middle Indo-Aryan (c. 600 BCE–1000 CE) consists principally of the Prakrit dialects, including Pali. Modern Indo-Aryan speech is largely a single dialect continuum spread over an undivided geographical space, so demarcations between languages and dialects are somewhat artificial. Complicating the situation are competing distinctions between languages with an old literary tradition, local language identification by native speakers (as in censuses), supraregional languages such as Modern Standard Hindi and Urdu, and labels introduced by linguists, particularly those of George Abraham Grierson. In the centre of the Indo-Aryan speech area (the “Hindi zone”), covering northern India and extending south as far as Madhya Pradesh, the most common language of administration and education is Modern Standard Hindi. Important regional languages in the northern Indian plain are Haryanvi, Kauravi, Braj, Awadhi, Chhattisgarhi, Bhojpuri, Magahi, and Maithili. Regional languages in Rajasthan include Marwari, Dhundhari, Harauti, and Malvi. In the Himalayan foothills of Himachal Pradesh are Grierson’s Pahari languages. Surrounding the Hindi zone, the most significant languages are, moving clockwise, Nepali (East Pahari), Assamese, Bengali, Oriya, Marathi, Gujarati, Sindhi, the speech of southern, northwestern, and northern Punjab province in Pakistan (called West Punjabi or Lahnda by Grierson), Punjabi, and Dogri.
I’m not 100% doubting, which is why I asked for sources, but other than the word “aryan,” why do you think this language or culture came from white people? It’s based entirely in the Middle East around middle eastern languages.
This is like saying that people from the Caucasus region are Caucasian
I don't know. What do you consider legitimate sources?
Anything believable, I guess. Other people have been speaking on your behalf in your absence and I’m less skeptical though not fully convinced yet. I’d look at anything you had to send with a sincere eye
(post is archived)