How many times per week is it acceptable for a wife to scream at her husband, throw things, damage the house, and tell him he should kill himself?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (109).

[–] • 0 pt

>Patrice loved to talk about how all guys and their SO should swing somewhat regularly. I don't much care for that, because smashing some other dude's chick while watching my girl get it from some other guy just doesn't do for me what it did for him.

That is because he is a nigger. Niggers are a completely different species of human with a completely different reproductive strategies. White kids are raised by families, black kids are raised by villages. That is because a key reproductive strategy for niggers is rape. In a black village a black kid can never be sure of who his father is, while a white kid in a white family can be fairly certain of it.

I like your description of your relationship. It sounds like both of you want what is best for each other and that alone is the only barometer of relationship health that matters. Everything else is just supporting skillsets.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

Your theory is not correct. It's weak enough that I can disprove it by the several black men I have known personally who were, apart from their skin color, no different from you and I.

That being said, most black men are niggers, though not all, so your premise is still flawed. It's not genetic but rather cultural. Most people, black or white, fall into the trap of inspiring to be a low IQ nigger. Young white liberal youth who spent the last 10 yrs screaming like children about my body my choice. Then covid flipped a switch overnight and now the state owns your body and only bigots disagree... These people are niggers.

The problems in our world to day are not a failure of skin color but a failure of the content of character.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

I appreciate the disagreement.

My response is not to argue the point, but to share a set of claims that I hold and just leave it at that.

My assertion is that they are comletely different species of human from white people. I also claim that there are least 7 completely separate species of human on the planet:

nigger
asian
shitskin
australian aboriginal
north / south american indian
white
polynesian

Roughly speaking, each of those are entirely separate species so much so that you automatically have past explanatory power. So, for example, statistically heritable traits like iq, personality predispositions by species, physionomical traits and even cultural / behavioural norms of each species are born out in statistics about each species. This, naturally, has predictive power as well. For example, if you know something about a species, for example a lion, you know that you will never be able to tame it and that if you leave your 2 year old with it it will tear it to shreds. Wheras if you know something about another species, let's say golden retreiver, you know that if the dog has been properly socialized it will protect not only your two year old it will give it's life for it.

So, 1355. Niggers make up 13% of the population but make up 55% of all crime (violent, I have to double check the specifics of this). So, if you know the species, you can not only have past explanatory power you now have future predictive power. Everywhere you have niggers in a foreign population you get the same ration for crime statistics across the globe.

Now, the person making the claim has to provide the evidence. As mentioned above, I am only sharing my claims and a teeny tiny suggestion that evidence might exist.

I used to believe what you believe as well. It turns out to be jew propaganda inserted into our school curriculums that teach our white children that all people are the same and all humans are one species. This is obviously wrong. The reasons jews have done this in every civilization they inhabit is because they are essentially an invasive species in every civilization they inhabit and part of their survival strategy is to slowly weaken the host through the slow insertion of cultural and linguistic poison that confuses our people to the true nature of the the universe around us.

The evidence for that would be somewhere along the categories of emergent intelligence in independetly organized intelligent systems as can be seen in fire ants being able to self organize in incredibly complicated ways to solve all kinds of systems that their individual brains have no capacity to solve. Human organization has all sorts of emergent network effects that we are only starting to see, the jew insertion of the 'we are all the same, we are all one species' is probably closer to the emergent behaviour of a species need to survive than it is a deliberate and organized plan.

I hope you find some of that interesting.

I appreciate the disagreement. My response is not to argue the point, but to share a set of claims that I hold and just leave it at that. My assertion is that they are comletely different species of human from white people. I also claim that there are least 7 completely separate species of human on the planet: * nigger * asian * shitskin * australian aboriginal * north / south american indian * white * polynesian Roughly speaking, each of those are entirely separate species so much so that you automatically have past explanatory power. So, for example, statistically heritable traits like iq, personality predispositions by species, physionomical traits and even cultural / behavioural norms of each species are born out in statistics about each species. This, naturally, has predictive power as well. For example, if you know something about a species, for example a lion, you know that you will never be able to tame it and that if you leave your 2 year old with it it will tear it to shreds. Wheras if you know something about another species, let's say golden retreiver, you know that if the dog has been properly socialized it will protect not only your two year old it will give it's life for it. So, 1355. Niggers make up 13% of the population but make up 55% of all crime (violent, I have to double check the specifics of this). So, if you know the species, you can not only have past explanatory power you now have future predictive power. Everywhere you have niggers in a foreign population you get the same ration for crime statistics across the globe. Now, the person making the claim has to provide the evidence. As mentioned above, I am only sharing my claims and a teeny tiny suggestion that evidence might exist. I used to believe what you believe as well. It turns out to be jew propaganda inserted into our school curriculums that teach our white children that all people are the same and all humans are one species. This is obviously wrong. The reasons jews have done this in every civilization they inhabit is because they are essentially an invasive species in every civilization they inhabit and part of their survival strategy is to slowly weaken the host through the slow insertion of cultural and linguistic poison that confuses our people to the true nature of the the universe around us. The evidence for that would be somewhere along the categories of emergent intelligence in independetly organized intelligent systems as can be seen in fire ants being able to self organize in incredibly complicated ways to solve all kinds of systems that their individual brains have no capacity to solve. Human organization has all sorts of emergent network effects that we are only starting to see, the jew insertion of the 'we are all the same, we are all one species' is probably closer to the emergent behaviour of a species need to survive than it is a deliberate and organized plan. I hope you find some of that interesting.

parent
link