WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

Once you see you cannot unsee. This is the lesson of studying revisionist history.

So I saw the history of Germany declaring upon usa and noted the inconsistencies. Spotting these flaws is how revisionism is deduced.

Hitler had zero history of following rules of nations and doing nice decleration of war. Totally out of character.

The bolsheviks within usa government NEEDED germany to declare war. They had to take a 100% isolationist fooled me once already american public to a 100% jingoistic American public.

Pearl Harbour roused anger. Getting Japan to attack was easy. Germany however was not responding to the antagonism of us bolsheviks actions.

Hence they absolutely needed germany to declare war to tie Germany to Japanese actions. As history shows. Germany was the target of usa and Japan a sideshow. Ww2 was anticomintern vs bolsheviks.

Another revisionist clue is how little Japan and Germany worked together or even liked each other. In fact Germany pre war was more linked to China than Japan.

So I looked for a video of Hitler declaring war. And yep all I found was copies of translations self admitted to being redacted. Full transcript was supposedly too long.

This is of course not proof of the declaration being a total fabrication.

So I'm asking. Any germany speakers here got a video of an reichstag address with Hitler explicitly declaring war upon usa pre 1942?

Once you see you cannot unsee. This is the lesson of studying revisionist history. So I saw the history of Germany declaring upon usa and noted the inconsistencies. Spotting these flaws is how revisionism is deduced. Hitler had zero history of following rules of nations and doing nice decleration of war. Totally out of character. The bolsheviks within usa government NEEDED germany to declare war. They had to take a 100% isolationist fooled me once already american public to a 100% jingoistic American public. Pearl Harbour roused anger. Getting Japan to attack was easy. Germany however was not responding to the antagonism of us bolsheviks actions. Hence they absolutely needed germany to declare war to tie Germany to Japanese actions. As history shows. Germany was the target of usa and Japan a sideshow. Ww2 was anticomintern vs bolsheviks. Another revisionist clue is how little Japan and Germany worked together or even liked each other. In fact Germany pre war was more linked to China than Japan. So I looked for a video of Hitler declaring war. And yep all I found was copies of translations self admitted to being redacted. Full transcript was supposedly too long. This is of course not proof of the declaration being a total fabrication. So I'm asking. Any germany speakers here got a video of an reichstag address with Hitler explicitly declaring war upon usa pre 1942?

(post is archived)

[–] 7 pts

No because it didnt exist.

Der Führer didnt declare was on Russia because his SS forward observers spotted them taking down their defenses, which signaled that they were clearing the field for an offensive; by attacking first he caught them with their pants down.

[–] 3 pts

Hitler always let his armies do the declaring.

Usa was the supposedly sole exception.

Have you looked for videos of his decleration?

I can find recordings of his speeches but not one where the words were. I declare upon usa.

Need help trying to find proof that he did. Absence of proof is telling

[–] 4 pts

England and France declared war on Germany after they Liberated Danzig in Poland.

[–] 1 pt

You are not helping.

I know allies declared war upon one of two nations that invaded Poland. The other nation they first allied with then later helped conquer and keep Poland.

Which BTW proves that the cause for war with Germany in ww2 was pure bs.

Recall I did say that once you see (the revisionism) you cannot unsee

[–] 2 pts

If you can find the video I can translate it for you.

I heard the supposed tape of Himmer or whoever admitting there was a plan to exterminate the jooos. It's a mistranslation. He's talking about removing the kikes completely from German land. You could imagine this means killing them, but in context he's clearly talking about deportation.

[–] 0 pt

Yep, deliberate mistranslations of words like 'Liquidation' -ie dissolving/ seizing all assets before emigration. 'Special treatment' ie Non-work or Hospital care in the labour/ concentration camps. 'Final solution', ie Solving the problem by riding Europe of the nasty parasitic joo to israel.

[–] 1 pt

>Another revisionist clue is how little Japan and Germany worked together or even liked each other. In fact Germany pre war was more linked to China than Japan.>>

Exactly. It was a war on those who had not capitulated. Are there any left?

[–] 1 pt
[–] 1 pt

I think you are adding the right kind of question.

Only information that I’m aware of in regards to this is an article in an American newspaper printed in December of 1941 in which the German ambassador is said to deny that Japan was the aggressor at Pearl Harbor. Since Pearl Harbor was a false flag attack the treaty between Germany and Japan would have been in force.

[–] 0 pt

I thought they did it but only after the USA declared war on Germany.

[–] 0 pt

Hadn't heard this. Found anything to the effect that usa declared first?

[–] 0 pt

The only reason Hitler declared war on the US was to try to get Japan to honor German request to make a military move on Siberia to draw back the Siberian divisions from the eastern front. Japan let Germany down and Stalin kept the Siberian divisions with their excellent winter fighting skills on the eastern front shutting down the German offensive.

[–] 0 pt

But what if Germany ignored pearl response as they had other transgressions?

[–] 0 pt

Oh and you're wrong. Those divisions were moved prior to pearl

[–] 0 pt

I know. Germany wanted the Japanese to draw them off. Japan didn't do it because they had their own goals.

[–] 0 pt

Because they weren't actually allies...

Yet we are told that they were?

[–] 0 pt

Come to think of it I've never heard this particular form of revisionism. In school we learned the US wardec on Germany because of the sinking of the Lucitania which was considered an act of war. However they forget to mention that the Lucitania was carrying weapons which made it a legit target and the Germans put out full page ads in major newspapers warning people that they knew it was carrying weapons and they didn't want to kill innocent civilian passengers.

[–] 1 pt

It's an old trick. You put civilians in harms way and hey presto. Body bags to gain a casus belli.

Usa was utterly duped into ww1 and ww2

[–] 0 pt

Goy, the only evidence you need is our word.

[+] [deleted] -1 pt
Load more (1 reply)