. And that rise at the end was still Carter. Reagan picked up the slide for another two years.
I don't think it's coincidence that right after Kennedy was assassinated we got uncontrolled spic immigration, Vietnam, gun control, off the gold standard, and declining real personal incomes. Every chart having to do with financial well-being shows that to be a turning point in American history.
The immigration act that started the destruction was in 1965, the gold standard was abandoned in 1971.
If Carter was such a great president why did he not end those two destructive forces?
I didn't say he was great. I'm just saying he's not the cause of the financial situation during his term.
He was not the solution either.
He really did not do much to fix the issues.
(post is archived)