WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

161

The FBI has literally admitted that they groom loners/extremists, hook them up with weapons, then swoop in and make an arrest to look good -- so why would anyone think they wouldn't set them up to commit FF events?

The FBI has literally admitted that they groom loners/extremists, hook them up with weapons, then swoop in and make an arrest to look good -- so why would anyone think they wouldn't set them up to commit FF events?

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

I think they do the shootings themselves and drop the nutter in there unconscious or something

The two main problems with this ubiquitous and recurrent theory:

  1. There is NEVER any good evidence of a real shooting, and plenty of evidence of fake/gay special effects and stage tricks.

  2. Faking a shooting is about one billion times easier than what you said, and creates less liability and risk for the perpetrators

[–] 0 pt
  1. is false. At least 1 shooting did : the batman one, where a cryptographic expert was hit,
[–] 0 pt

The Bataclan shooting was also fake.

The only picture people refer to from that “shooting” is the one everyone knows, and it’s obviously fake. The “blood” is mopped into the shape of a heart, no detail is seen, it makes no sense that that would be the only picture, it is very low quality, etc.

These are very lazy, low-effort fakes. The power of suggestion is so strong that it takes only a minimal attempt at staging a fake shooting for Americans to talk about how “graphic” it is.

People have and would refer to the photo I mentioned as “graphic” and “shocking.” But the truth is, it’s not. It doesn’t even show anything. It’s your imagination that makes it graphic.