Wasn't that more a social message and less an economic model? A "put your race and your homeland first," message not a "we take all the stuff and give you the scraps," plan.

Thanks for your even handed reply. My intention is not to come across as anti-women, but sometimes that's how it appears.

Clearly there have been good female politicians, just as clearly there are roles in the police and military for women. But the attitude "a chick is better than a white male every time" is poison. Gender roles are real and what's more they exist for a reason. People should play to their strengths even if sometimes it means you don't get to be an astronaut.

But maybe its useful that they are in most circumstances. Like when caring for children.

In listing all of the female featues in this thread, which are bloody accurate (great job everyone), what we are also simultaneously saying is that either our men have failed us and gave up their leadership roles in society and families or something else happened that has made men loose that level of control.

It's plastics in the food and water. They have feminized men and made them less willing to take control, which has allowed women to assume leadership positions. Of course this tendency has been accelerated by social factors, such as the Jew-created woman's movement, but at the root of things the shift of power from men to women is biological. We have been poisoning ourselves and our children for fifty years with plastics that mimic human hormones and feminize men.

We men will often catalog all the psychological features that make them different from us and just leave the list as a list. Often the list is full of negative sounding connotations,

We have that list too. Its been appropriated as DNC party platform.

Honestly feminist’s criticisms of men are often valid to an extent. In spite of what is asserted around here, males are not any more virtuous than women, they just have different survival strategies that come in to conflict with women’s survival strategies often. Obviously we have to negotiate comprmises or go extinct.

We depend on culture to help mediate intersex conflict and that culture has been hijacked and exploited by jews to loot our society more effectively. They are truly at the heart of this miscommunication between men and women. But I digress.

Neuroticism is, I imagine, a very useful trait when you are trying to keep a little baby alive.

On the other hand, women have a very different set of pressures on them. Women have to find a man and have children VERY VERY young. Before modern nanny state civilzation of the last 50 years, women had to bear children at a very young age

My recent research on female marriage age within monogamous vs polygamous societies, and in particular NW europeans does not agree with that. Parish records show mean marriage age to be ~23 for women for the last 6 to 8 hundred years, and Tacitus puts marriage age of germanic tribes at 20 during the Roman empire. This is a feature of monogamist societies. Just sayin. It aint 13.

It may be that the heavier reliance of females on males in cold climates constrained european societies to be monogamous and caused white males to take a more K strategy along the r/K continuum.

Whites are high trust and highly cooperative and have created highly stable prosperous societies that everybody likes. Black, jews, muzzies, latinos, are not capable of accomplishing that by themselves. But now instead of distributing the wealth and stability at the familiy unit level, we have (re-)distributed wealth at the individual level through an overly bloated dysfunctional bureacracy.

The bureacracy is no longer a lean efficient means of organizing and coordinating the wealth production of our economy; it is an end unto itself, a feudal aristocracy supported by serfs making useful stuff which is confiscated and redistributed by fat, power-tripping out-of-touch karens that man fake bureacratic jobs, just welfare-busywork. Social workers, therapists, lawyers, insurance agents, loan officers, teachers, etc. Their usefulness is doubtful. This is where all the women have gone, but they aren’t contributing anything useful, on average.

Men are still bringing home the bacon but its being taken from them and handed to some lebian communist librarian, who might have been his wife in another time.

The bureacracy is fake and gay. Its been expanded by jews to gain power over the economy. It doesnt make any wealth directly. Women have sidled up to the free gibs window by getting jobs in the bureacracy and they lack the self awareness to see the they are economically nearly worthless in these sorts of positions. I had a bureacratic job, it was fake and gay.

Good answer.

Really well thought out.

Thoroughly enjoyed your comment.