Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

Good traits get amplified in the population, bad traits get reduced or eliminated.

There are many ways to go about it. A civilization automatically exerts a kind of genic stress on a population, some people have more kids and some don't reproduce at all.

You could just pay high IQ, non-psychopaths, that are healthy to have more kids.

You could sterilize people under a certain IQ and who have genetic diseases, something the USA used to do and the Jews objected to because they're actually a low IQ and genetically damaged group.

And there are lots of options in between like sterilizing people after a certain number of children depending on their IQ or other criteria.

The Jewish argument of eugenics is that it's inhumane somehow, but I think having people die because they're deformed or can't take care of themselves, or growing the numbers of defective people until society collapses is less humane.

Eugenics also nicely addresses the issue of unrestrained population growth and decline since you can match the number of births to the amount of people your civilization requires.

I also really want to see what humanity, or the White population since I don't like the idea of picking the direction other races go for them, can become with eugenics.

How smart can Whites become?

How fit can Whites become?

How attractive can Whites become?

How long can Whites come to live without medical assistance?

And I do realize that gene editting is just around the corner, assuming the West doesn't collapse in on itself because it can't handle the basics of what a country is and it screwed over the White Millennials and later Whites to the point they want to take everyone out with them. The idea of editing genomes and switching out body parts is a wonderful day dream that I hope becomes reality.

I also recognize there are problems with gene editing that might take time to resolve, incompatible combinations of genes that make editing a little more complicated than just switching out one gene for another.

It makes sense to start where we are with the tools we have available, and eugenics is something we can do right now.

Good traits get amplified in the population, bad traits get reduced or eliminated. There are many ways to go about it. A civilization automatically exerts a kind of genic stress on a population, some people have more kids and some don't reproduce at all. You could just pay high IQ, non-psychopaths, that are healthy to have more kids. You could sterilize people under a certain IQ and who have genetic diseases, something the USA used to do and the Jews objected to because they're actually a low IQ and genetically damaged group. And there are lots of options in between like sterilizing people after a certain number of children depending on their IQ or other criteria. The Jewish argument of eugenics is that it's inhumane somehow, but I think having people die because they're deformed or can't take care of themselves, or growing the numbers of defective people until society collapses is less humane. Eugenics also nicely addresses the issue of unrestrained population growth and decline since you can match the number of births to the amount of people your civilization requires. I also really want to see what humanity, or the White population since I don't like the idea of picking the direction other races go for them, can become with eugenics. How smart can Whites become? How fit can Whites become? How attractive can Whites become? How long can Whites come to live without medical assistance? And I do realize that gene editting is just around the corner, assuming the West doesn't collapse in on itself because it can't handle the basics of what a country is and it screwed over the White Millennials and later Whites to the point they want to take everyone out with them. The idea of editing genomes and switching out body parts is a wonderful day dream that I hope becomes reality. I also recognize there are problems with gene editing that might take time to resolve, incompatible combinations of genes that make editing a little more complicated than just switching out one gene for another. It makes sense to start where we are with the tools we have available, and eugenics is something we can do right now.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (77).
[–] • 1 pt (edited )

if you limited reproduction to 130 iq youd eliminate blacks and latinos, but asians and hymies would almost completely fill in that space. it matters little whether that iq is real or is just a population genetically inclined to take or cheat on tests.

itd be better to start out limiting it to above 90, and every fifty or so years move it up a degree till you reach 100 then keep it there.

[–] • 1 pt

One thing worth noting about IQ is it's a calibrated metric.

We could calibrate it to exclusively the US population and use it to select the lowest quartile, half, etc. for sterilization.

There are lots of options for eugenics. Sterilization isn't absolutely necessary actually. Given the declining birth rates of the West, you could just incentivize high IQ births somehow. Unfortunately, the Western governments lack any sort of sane planning by the looks of things and their economics, culture, etc. are currently geared to discouraging high IQ births.

[–] • 0 pt

Not true, the white man's IQ curve has a disproportional lean. Beyond 120, as a percentage of population whites produce the most over 140s of any race by a mile, asians out average us because 100-115 IQ is a higher percentage in their people, kikes have a lumpy curve that leans over 100 but only at maybe 100-110 do they have a higher population percentage. There are more 140 IQ White men today than all other 140 IQ non whites combined and most of those nonwhite 140s are indians who are like our genetic cousins and almost certainly if genetic engineering were available on a consumer level india would become a white country in under a century.

That said a eugenic selection so stout and severe would never happen. Might be able to get away with free sterilization for people under 84 IQ and tax credits for people over 120 to have babies.