Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

348

Here's just some random kid the media is promoting for some reason.

They just got up from eating their bowl of cereal one day and the media cameras rushed to hear what they had to say about guns and planet Earth?

And they want to tell you to ban guns and to not re-industrialize the USA!

Did they really think that schtick was going to work?

It only created a sense of instinctive rejection of what they had to say, like someone walking up and saying, "I'm just some random person with no affiliation with anything, but here's why you should buy this product".

And that "out of the mouth of babes" logic is false; kids are dumb. Some are smarter than others, but they never seem to be as intelligent as they will become as adults. Sometimes they point out things everyone else hadn't considered because of familiarity like, "Why do you go to work if you don't like it and it doesn't pay enough?", but that's about it.

Using kids as spokespeople to push a political objective is sick and really shortsighted. Remember when that crack head actress was used for the D.A.R.E. program and then later admitted to using drugs? I wouldn't be surprised if Greta comes out and admits she burned down a forest just for the hell of it.

Here's just some random kid the media is promoting for some reason. They just got up from eating their bowl of cereal one day and the media cameras rushed to hear what they had to say about guns and planet Earth? And they want to tell you to ban guns and to not re-industrialize the USA! Did they really think that schtick was going to work? It only created a sense of instinctive rejection of what they had to say, like someone walking up and saying, "I'm just some random person with no affiliation with anything, but here's why you should buy this product". And that "out of the mouth of babes" logic is false; kids are dumb. Some are smarter than others, but they never seem to be as intelligent as they will become as adults. Sometimes they point out things everyone else hadn't considered because of familiarity like, "Why do you go to work if you don't like it and it doesn't pay enough?", but that's about it. Using kids as spokespeople to push a political objective is sick and really shortsighted. Remember when that crack head actress was used for the D.A.R.E. program and then later admitted to using drugs? I wouldn't be surprised if Greta comes out and admits she burned down a forest just for the hell of it.

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 4 pts

They use children as human shields for their own shitty opinions. Can't tell you how many, "How dare you criticize a disabled child" comments I saw when that kid was at its height in popularity.

[–] • 3 pts

Did they really think that schtick was going to work?

It works pretty well on NPCs

[–] • 1 pt

NPC's are all i talk to recently...lol They have no thoughts or words beyond the programming they get . . It really makes the future look scary dealing with these zombie idiots

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Children can't be criticized.. Even when they are caught in a lie, "awww well she's just a kid"

[–] • 1 pt

Greta is a Soros creation. So is Harry’s wife

[–] • 1 pt

Heard malala got the nobel peace prize

[–] • 1 pt

The media has to talk about something, and it certainly can't talk about what's actually happening, because that is forbidden by its owners, so it talks about fluff, like the royals.

[–] • 1 pt

I used to jave to suffer from in meetings and presentations, it geys to a point where some start throwing the shit on the wall and seeing what sticks. Hogg outlived his usefulness, so did the ones before him.

[–] • 1 pt

I’m too lazy to find it but there is a quote in Mein Kampf about how random ordinary people would be skyrocketed to fame beyond that of an important person who did a lot of good things. It’s intentional.

Load more (7 replies)