WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

Sorry for the poor title. New here and didn't know how the site worked.

The whole reason I left reddit was to get away from all the liberal censorship.

I was banned by Crensch on QPatriots for saying Trump and "Q" are essentially traitors until they prove themselves to be otherwise. I said I am still hoping something happens but until then they are sell outs. And just like on Reddit, just like the mainstream media, my post was deleted and I was banned from posting on there.

Not like I was trolling or spamming or saying anything mindless and ridiculous.. I could see some sort of censorship for those things. Nope, I rocked the boat a little and was banned.

The fact that we can't even have a decent debate or discussion on Poal irritates me.

https://poal.co/static/images/WJQ99D.png https://poal.co/static/images/5iYPPn.png

***Sorry for the poor title. New here and didn't know how the site worked.*** The whole reason I left reddit was to get away from all the liberal censorship. I was banned by Crensch on QPatriots for saying Trump and "Q" are essentially traitors until they prove themselves to be otherwise. I said I am still hoping something happens but until then they are sell outs. And just like on Reddit, just like the mainstream media, my post was deleted and I was banned from posting on there. Not like I was trolling or spamming or saying anything mindless and ridiculous.. I could see some sort of censorship for those things. Nope, I rocked the boat a little and was banned. The fact that we can't even have a decent debate or discussion on Poal irritates me. https://poal.co/static/images/WJQ99D.png https://poal.co/static/images/5iYPPn.png

(post is archived)

Faggot OP thinks a mod banning people on his own personal sub equates to "Poal censorship"

[–] 4 pts

You're right. Poor choice of words. I'm a noob.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

all good man.

we've all been a noob at one point

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Im not fond of censorship to the exclusion of preserving personal privacy. I do however support the freedom to ignore.

On a certain level I can get behind punting people heavily into making an ass out of themselves. However I oppose that censorship too as its the same line of thinking that gives justification to "hate" speech censorship and numerous other flavors of censorship.

[–] 0 pt

You're not wrong. I was ok with everything except for "Misleading Title" on this. I will not question the opinion of the operators or the results of the election. Mods can censor, which is fine. You called out the censorship, which is fine. That's not misleading.

[–] 2 pts

This was my exact thought.

[–] 1 pt

Of course it was, your majesty!

[–] [Sticky] 0 pt

Do people like the censorship in a user sub on Poal?

FTFY

[–] 0 pt

Thanks dude. That's what I meant.

[–] 4 pts

I would recommend blocking his subs and moving on.

[–] 3 pts

Thanks, just frustrated. The whole reason I came here was to get away from this kind of crap.

[–] 5 pts

Yeah the whole reason I started this place was to get away from that kind of crap, but I can't always just step in and stop people from moderating a sub they created how they want.

[–] 1 pt

Thanks man. I'm new to a lot of this. So I don't quite understand how a lot of the sub stuff works. It makes sense that you can't just stop all the mods from banning people from their own subs. I appreciate the site.

[–] 0 pt

Kill yourself.

You came to someone else's website and expected something from them. Quit being an entitled qoomer.

[–] 1 pt

Lol I was waiting for you to post. you're cute when you're angry.

[–] 2 pts

The fact that we can't even have a decent debate or discussion on Poal irritates me.

Crensch's moderation style is distinct from how most other users mod their subs, hon.

[–] 1 pt

test

[–] 0 pt

Haven't you already done that?

[–] 1 pt

I'm positive.

[–] 2 pts

Crensch is a fag. Just block all the Q subs.

[–] 0 pt

honestly not a terrible idea.

[–] 1 pt

In defense of Crensch, I know several of those accounts are very tiresome trolls. If I were into banning people, those are some of the people I would ban. If I were into banning people that is.

[–] 1 pt

(((I))) deserve everything I want from this private website owned and ran by others!!!!

(((OP)))

[–] 1 pt

I wish the leaderboards could be organised by 'time until banned'

[–] 0 pt

I do the reverse. Whenever I see a Q sub I just ban it. People have complained about that crunchy person I prefer smooth peanut butter and avoid altogether.

[–] 1 pt

I prefer smooth peanut butter

You probably use daymode too you barbarian.

[–] 0 pt

If you blocked his subs on voat you might as well block them here, too.

Greatawakening was the aidsiest spam posting sub on voat.

[–] 0 pt

crensh loves the qlarp and is sick of being called a fucking moron. Let him keep his circle jerk lubed up who cares.

[–] 0 pt

You got a point. I just needed to vent. I'm chill.

[–] 0 pt

Generally I agree its not good. But I dont have a problem with smaller subs being curated. I have a problem when the site mods start monkeying with what bubbles up to the top of the board, or when major subs that cover a broad topic like news start doing it.

[–] 1 pt

Yeah you definitely have a point. And I didn't mean to make it sound like that was my problem. I just didn't know what kind of pull Crensch had around here. I'm pretty new and already getting banned from places put me over the top.

Load more (14 replies)