You'd lose that money - I've given him plenty of chances and . He has committed his reputation to the insane theory that global warming is a Jew conspiracy enabled by their control of global science, and provided no evidence or motive to back it up - there's really no dignified way out.
Again, thanks for the chat, there's no need to continue.
Well okay, but the link you provided, opens with you calling the content trash when it doesn’t seem like you actually read the content. That’s a pretty bold claim to make about something you haven’t read, it’s a strong opinion formed purely on a title. Do you see what I’m trying to get at here? You haven’t read the arguments and formed responses you are just using your initial emotional reaction, or at least that’s what it looks like from the outside.
It's you who hasn't read it:
The title of the post and its content state "Sorry Global Warming Alarmists, The Earth Is Cooling"
From the article itself:
That is because natural climate cycles have already turned from warming to cooling, global temperatures have already been declining for more than 10 years, and global temperatures will continue to decline for another two decades or more.
The thing is, that article was published in 2012. We now know that global temperatures did not continue to decline after 2012, .
If it was you that posted that article, and were then made aware of how their claims have already been disproven, what would you do?
I guess it depends on how passionate I was about the issue. If I cared little then I would probably say something to the effect of "Oh I didn't know that." If I strongly disagreed I would go try to find more evidence to backup my argument.
You are correct I didn't read the article but calling something trash is going to illicit a similar response, you can't go around throwing insults without expecting to get them back. Its like going into a room and yelling fire then wondering why everyone is running for the exits.
What other site admin would even tolerate you calling him an idiot or a bad person? has not only tolerated he has engaged you, if that isn't proof he at least committed to free speech then I have no idea what would convince you short of agreeing with you on every argument you make which would be suppressing his own speech and defeat the purpose of the site.
I did provide you evidence that the consensus is filled with a majority of Jews.
You just refuse to acknowledge it because you’re not programmed to accept facts.
You’re just a sad NPClown
What evidence was that?
No wonder why no one takes you seriously wherever you go.
https://poal.co/s/Conservation/27421/07c4f454-0b9d-471f-80d8-891cf70de9da
(post is archived)