WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

235

The Voat way was: upvoat stuff you agree with.

The Poal way is: upvote stuff you think should be discussed.

The Jew way is the same as the Poal way: discuss any insane idea just because. That leads to deconstructionism, which led to the destruction of the West.

Just stick to the Voat way. Upvote stuff you agree with, downvote stuff you hate. Maybe it's less civilized, but fuckem.

The Voat way was: upvoat stuff you agree with. The Poal way is: upvote stuff you think should be discussed. The Jew way is the same as the Poal way: discuss any insane idea just because. That leads to deconstructionism, which led to the destruction of the West. Just stick to the Voat way. Upvote stuff you agree with, downvote stuff you hate. Maybe it's less civilized, but fuckem.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

And I don't want to worry about having my account flattened just because I used a feature that's standard on every other platform. Is that so hard to understand?

And what makes you think you are entitled to come here and immediately demand that poal change its culture to please you and your dozen frens?

[–] 0 pt

And what makes you think you are entitled to come here and immediately demand that poal change its culture to please you and your dozen frens?

I'm not making demands. I'm providing feedback on your bad policy. And this is why you don't have the maturity and thick skin required to run a site like Voat. Yes, your site was irrelevant until Voat arrived. A small hugbox where your experimental policies did not matter. Now you're relevant, but you want to act like a petulant child when the relevant user base provides feedback.

[–] 0 pt

You are such a hypocrite with double standard.

You guys did exactly the same to faggitors when they came on voat and immediately made demands.

Give me a break, Shlomo.

[–] 0 pt

You are such a hypocrite with double standard.

Sorry, bud, but YOU are the blatant hypocrite here. The explicit goal of the Poal downvote policy is to encourage dissenting voices. But as soon as dissenting voices arrive questioning your policy, you revert to childish antics and non-arguments.