WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

175

The Voat way was: upvoat stuff you agree with.

The Poal way is: upvote stuff you think should be discussed.

The Jew way is the same as the Poal way: discuss any insane idea just because. That leads to deconstructionism, which led to the destruction of the West.

Just stick to the Voat way. Upvote stuff you agree with, downvote stuff you hate. Maybe it's less civilized, but fuckem.

The Voat way was: upvoat stuff you agree with. The Poal way is: upvote stuff you think should be discussed. The Jew way is the same as the Poal way: discuss any insane idea just because. That leads to deconstructionism, which led to the destruction of the West. Just stick to the Voat way. Upvote stuff you agree with, downvote stuff you hate. Maybe it's less civilized, but fuckem.

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 7 pts

Easier to forum slide if the community can't downvote. And especially in the case of moderators that micromanage feeds and the potential for 3rd parties that may pay for content to get exposure. Always question intention.

Just stick to the Voat way. Upvote stuff you agree with, downvote stuff you hate. Maybe it's less civilized, but fuckem.

All your votes will be erased if you do that. The issue isn't even that your votes will disappear in itself, its the fact that you might lull yourself into the sense that upvote/downvote ratios are informative of actual community feedback when they aren't. The voat vote system was superior for a number of reasons, but I suspect the poal vote system is better adjusted to forum micromanagement and aggregating target (funded) material to the audience.

[–] 2 pts

Poal gets no funding other than donations. Most of the time I have payed for it out of my own pocket.

[–] 1 pt

Thank you for being awesome.

[–] 1 pt

Funded, you say? That could be quite damning.