Everyone chooses whites over niggers, even niggers themselves. They know they're shitty versions of actual humans.
Everyone chooses whites over niggers, even niggers themselves. They know they're shitty versions of actual humans.
I have no idea.
That being said, I used to live in a predominantly dark skinned country, and this rings true.
People over there definitely prefer lighter skinned people, be it lighter skinned natives, or actual white people.
I have no idea.
That being said, I used to live in a predominantly dark skinned country, and this rings true.
People over there definitely prefer lighter skinned people, be it lighter skinned natives, or actual white people.
Was the person asking the children the questions during the test black himself?
If it was a white guy, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out why a small child of one race alone in a room with a full grown adult of another might want to appease said full grown adult by saying that all the good things apply to the white person, and all of the bad things apply to the black person.
I don't see how that experiment proves anything, other than one well-known principle of power dynamics, the fact that people in weaker positions of power will appease and do their best to try and tell the person in the higher position of power what they think the "right answer" is.
I would be interested to see what a Doll Test would look like nowadays, if you put some Gen Alpha toddlers/preschool children in a room with a black dude, gave them a black and white doll, and had the black dude ask them which one is [DESCRIPTOR FOR GOOD] and which one is [DESCRIPTOR FOR BAD].
Was the person asking the children the questions during the test black himself?
If it was a white guy, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out why a small child of one race alone in a room with a full grown adult of another might want to appease said full grown adult by saying that all the good things apply to the white person, and all of the bad things apply to the black person.
I don't see how that experiment proves anything, other than one well-known principle of power dynamics, the fact that people in weaker positions of power will appease and do their best to try and tell the person in the higher position of power what they think the "right answer" is.
I would be interested to see what a Doll Test would look like nowadays, if you put some Gen Alpha toddlers/preschool children in a room with a black dude, gave them a black and white doll, and had the black dude ask them which one is [DESCRIPTOR FOR GOOD] and which one is [DESCRIPTOR FOR BAD].
black girl got same results. this study has been done a few times. although it seems the white preference rates dropped for black kids in a recent study, but 47% of black girls still said white dolls were the prettiest.
black girl got same results. this study has been done a few times. although it seems the white preference rates dropped for black kids in a recent study, but 47% of black girls still said white dolls were the prettiest.
I don't care whether the black children were boys or girls, what I was questioning was the race/gender of the psychologist asking the question.
Take a look at 2:25 for instance. It's a full grown caucasian male grilling a black child on which skin tone he likes best. In that instance, how do you think the child is going to react?
He acts meekly, unsure, because he instinctually knows the difference between him and the researcher, he knows that the researcher knows the difference, but he's confused as shit as to why the fully-grown man is asking him, a child, to confirm this information. It is confusing. It goes against what his instincts as a young boy tell him how the world should work.
So, he answers in the most neutral, milque-toast, LOW-RISK way imaginable: "He's...white....and....I don't know".
Because the kid doesn't yet have the mental ability to realize that this is just a test, this researcher has no personal beef with him, he's not in any danger, etc. Because he is a child.
What skin color do you think the young, defenseless child is going to pick in this scenario? As any child from a broken home will be able to attest, truth is relative to whoever has the biggest frame and meatiest paws. Even children who don't come from broken or abusive homes will feel this same pressure, as the laws of power dynamics are literally written into our DNA. Appease big things so don't die. Kill small things so eat so don't die.
How do we know the children being questioned aren't just trying to display "in-group" preference towards the "in-group" they've temporarily found themselves in, the majority caucasian researchers, because their instincts are currently screaming at them: "DANGER, NOT-LIKE TRIBE OF HUMANS CONTROL AREA, APPEASE TO SURVIVE"?
Which, again, makes me wonder how the test might differ if the race of the psychologists themselves differed.
I wouldn't be surprised if, say for example, you took some suburban 7 year olds, took them on a car ride to a psychology research hospital in Chicago or Detroit, and had the all-black team of psychologists ask them which doll they prefer. Would the white kids still choose their actual in-group? Or would they do their best to appease the full-grown strangers their parents have left them with?
I don't care whether the black children were boys or girls, what I was questioning was the race/gender of the psychologist asking the question.
Take a look at 2:25 for instance. It's a full grown caucasian male grilling a black child on which skin tone he likes best. In that instance, how do you think the child is going to react?
He acts meekly, unsure, because he instinctually knows the difference between him and the researcher, he knows that the researcher knows the difference, but he's confused as shit as to why the fully-grown man is asking him, a child, to confirm this information. It is confusing. It goes against what his instincts as a young boy tell him how the world should work.
So, he answers in the most neutral, milque-toast, LOW-RISK way imaginable: "He's...white....and....I don't know".
Because the kid doesn't yet have the mental ability to realize that this is just a test, this researcher has no personal beef with him, he's not in any danger, etc. Because he is a child.
What skin color do you think the young, defenseless child is going to pick in this scenario? As any child from a broken home will be able to attest, truth is relative to whoever has the biggest frame and meatiest paws. Even children who don't come from broken or abusive homes will feel this same pressure, as the laws of power dynamics are literally written into our DNA. Appease big things so don't die. Kill small things so eat so don't die.
How do we know the children being questioned aren't just trying to display "in-group" preference towards the "in-group" they've temporarily found themselves in, the majority caucasian researchers, because their instincts are currently screaming at them: "DANGER, NOT-LIKE TRIBE OF HUMANS CONTROL AREA, APPEASE TO SURVIVE"?
Which, again, makes me wonder how the test might differ if the race of the psychologists themselves differed.
I wouldn't be surprised if, say for example, you took some suburban 7 year olds, took them on a car ride to a psychology research hospital in Chicago or Detroit, and had the all-black team of psychologists ask them which doll they prefer. Would the white kids still choose their actual in-group? Or would they do their best to appease the full-grown strangers their parents have left them with?
yeah i'm saying a black high school girl did an experiment. my use of 'girl' threw you.
yeah i'm saying a black high school girl did an experiment. my use of 'girl' threw you.
If a flower is pretty to everyone, it's objectively pretty. If a race is pretty to everyone you're a racist.
If a flower is pretty to everyone, it's objectively pretty. If a race is pretty to everyone you're a racist.
they dont even put black dolls near the white ones in the kids section, noticed that the other day when i was looking for cards
they dont even put black dolls near the white ones in the kids section, noticed that the other day when i was looking for cards
do they segregate the 'congrats on being a single mom' cards from 'happy 60th anniversary' cards too?
do they segregate the 'congrats on being a single mom' cards from 'happy 60th anniversary' cards too?
because they prefer an original human female doll, over some fake theme monkey edition.
because they prefer an original human female doll, over some fake theme monkey edition.
dark skin = tanned from work in the sun (low status worker)
light skin = high skilled worker (aristocracy)
dark skin = tanned from work in the sun (low status worker)
light skin = high skilled worker (aristocracy)
Because their dna knows
Because their dna knows
(post is archived)