WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

687

Yeah, I know I didn't word the title all that well, but I just woke up, fuck you.

But, it bugs the piss out of me when a politician says anything negative about another politician/powerful person, no matter how small, they're always "blasting" or "slamming" them.

Unless it's an option piece, I generally just avoid articles like that. It's buzzfeed-tier journalism.

Yeah, I know I didn't word the title all that well, but I just woke up, fuck you. But, it bugs the piss out of me when a politician says anything negative about another politician/powerful person, no matter how small, they're always "blasting" or "slamming" them. Unless it's an option piece, I generally just avoid articles like that. It's buzzfeed-tier journalism.

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

Agreed. In the 1800-1900’s “yellow journalism” flourished. The use of hyperbole, misleading headlines and generally shitbag prose was rampant. Then the pendulum went the other way and up to the 70’s or so “just the facts” was the norm. Now we’re back to “man bites dog” hyperbole,innuendo and outright lying in the press.