That is the bare minimum. They are not a desirable member.
Sure, but you're saying that they're allowed to live even if they're only contributing to themselves and not civilization.
The line between these niche people being allowed to live and animals not being allowed to live is getting thin. Why aren't the animals allowed to live? They contribute to themselves and their families, but not to civilization, just like these niche people.
The fact that it is a thin line between humans and animals in your mind is worrisome. They. Are. Not. Human. They are less than. They are a resource and should not be personalized. The fuck man. Animals eat us if given a chance. Try explaining to them why they shouldn't and see how that goes
Come on, man. We're getting somewhere.
You said humans get to live if they contribute to themselves and their family.
I'm taking that condition and applying it to animals.
Animals contribute to themselves and their families. But you say they don't get to live.
So why do humans get to live but animals don't?
The animals we're mainly referring to (cows, chickens, and pigs) do not want to eat us. Pigs would if we died, but not when we're alive.
(post is archived)