You are applying human concepts that keep the human population safe and alive as a whole and applying it to creatures who cannot reason. You are using your feelings instead of logic.
This next part is where we disagree. So you've named the trait as the ability to reason. I say "If a retard can't reason, is it okay to murder the retard?" I say no, you say yes. You have a consistent position, but it's not one many agree with. If I wanted to push you, I could say "Is it okay to infinitely holocaust retards?" You'd have to say yes to be consistent.
If by holocaust them you mean put them to productive use like we do with retard animals I would day yes. We dont pointlessly kill animals no matter how sad it makes you. Farming retards for organs or useful things is smart
Yes, we don't pointlessly, but we do needlessly. Since we can live perfectly fine without holocausting them, it's needless
(post is archived)