No as they do not have civilization. In any sense of the word.
No as they do not have civilization. In any sense of the word.
If a person is ONLY contributing enough resources for themselves and family, then the person is not contributing to civilization, right?
If a person is ONLY contributing enough resources for themselves and family, then the person is not contributing to civilization, right?
That is the bare minimum. They are not a desirable member.
That is the bare minimum. They are not a desirable member.
Sure, but you're saying that they're allowed to live even if they're only contributing to themselves and not civilization.
The line between these niche people being allowed to live and animals not being allowed to live is getting thin. Why aren't the animals allowed to live? They contribute to themselves and their families, but not to civilization, just like these niche people.
Sure, but you're saying that they're allowed to live even if they're only contributing to themselves and not civilization.
The line between these niche people being allowed to live and animals not being allowed to live is getting thin. Why aren't the animals allowed to live? They contribute to themselves and their families, but not to civilization, just like these niche people.
(post is archived)