Divide and conquer.
Crensch and srayzie made another sub to undermine us.
Other faggots did the same. Content got diluted and the native group got annoyed, now we're here.
We only wanted one sub, but Crensch was desperate for people to read his name.
We do not endorse name faggots.
I'm not interested in engaging in e-drama or attention-seeking behavior. I strongly believe it to be a waste of time and a distraction. Time is the only real currency we have.
Please respond to to the substance of my inquiry and leave your baggage elsewhere. I would greatly appreciate it.
It's awfully convenient that when I try to reveal people having poor intentions, it's suddenly "drama" and not an explanation of things...
I'm simply explaining the timeline. I don't care if you think it's dramatic.
Crensch leaves me alone because he knows I bite, but that doesn't mean I won't tell people the truth.
Let me explain it like this: Q told us to make a certain place to discuss what we did. We made it, only to find someone else wanted to circumvent the suggestion in order to garner ethos for themselves.
I don't know Crensch personally. I've spoken to him only a handful of times.
Why is it that when I try to reveal to people that someone is purposefully ignoring the rest of us and making look bad, that I'm then "dramatic" and other bullshit.
How fucking insulting.
Dude, I wouldn't waste my time on that guy. He's not arguing in good faith.
You appear to be extremely easily offended. Let me know when you're willing to talk like an adult and I'll happily engage.
The user v user shit does seem like the work of somebody with alts trying to make a spectacle.
Low-T feedback loops don't really interest me. I'd prefer to just ignore it.
Being in an anon sub makes it super easy for shills to shill and stay anonymous.
It works both ways, fren
(post is archived)