Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

White babies must be carried to term.

Mixed-race and nonwhite babies can be aborted at any time.

Wasn't that the point of pushing abortion in the first place?

[–] • 1 pt

I thought the underlying honest answer was so that women could get out of their decisions. The funny thing about the white race realist response as we would not have to dehumanize them if they would stay in their own shithole patches of earth and stop invading us.

[–] • 1 pt

we would not have to dehumanize them if they would stay in their own shithole patches of earth and stop invading us.

Go further - lands belong to those who can defend them and make them fruitful/prosperous. So the shitskins are owed no existence in this world except that which their competitive success awards them (just like any animal).

Yes, women are getting out of their bad choices and are enabled to use pregnancy as a weapon. Both the mother and the father should be able to enact an abortion, or neither should.

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts (edited )

When there is fetal brain activity a consciousness is forming. That's a human being at that point, even though none of us can remember becoming aware in the womb.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

This question has already been answered by ethicists. The cells are human cells. They are not going to grow and turn into an elephant or a mouse. They are going to grow into a human, therefore it is always a human. This stance is further supported by the stem cell industry. An entire sector of industry has been created out of the cultulivation of human stem cells which are extremely valuable and are finding to have enormous potential in application.

Edit: This was the explination given to me in Grad School by a rep for a stem cell research company. Our class had to create a policy report on an issue they were having around ethics in using actual stem cells vs. synthetic stem cell material and potential funding issues. The entire class was given the same info then we each created our policy solution and present it to him and defended it. I went to an extremely liberal all womens college. Everyone else demanded that the company stick to real stem cells as a way to reinforce the "my body/my choice" movement and to find funders that aligned with this belief. Ugh..The rep looked like he would naw his arm off. Then I presented in support of synthetic to avoid the abortion conflict and many feminist connotations all together to access funding across the board. He jumped up and said, "you get it. This is exactly right and what we decided to do". You could see the steam rolling out of the ears of half the class. IT.WAS.GLORIOUS.

[–] • 1 pt

I will take this into consideration next time I argue against baby killers, thank you.

[–] • 0 pt

Synthetic stem cells is a thing? Are they made from swabs of newborn baby blood or what? You could make a post about it if you have time as it would be interesting and informative.

[–] • 1 pt

I think this is what we were talking about (it's been 5 years so a little foggy). Basically you can now use any cell and through a process turn it into an "embryo" that will grow however it's manipulated to grow. So they could take cells from your arm and grow it into a mock embryo, implant it in a womb, and through the magic of science way over my head grow an eyeball...no human fetus needed.

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-43960363