You are quoting someone else's quote with the implication you are replying to me. You then go on to address their quote in the context of my comments. Which completely changed the tone and meaning of what I stated. It is dishonest.
While I recognize you changed the quote, it is still wrongly misattributing the quote to me.
You are quoting someone else's quote with the implication you are replying to me. You then go on to address their quote in the context of my comments. Which completely changed the tone and meaning of what I stated. It is dishonest.
While I recognize you changed the quote, it is still wrongly misattributing the quote to me.
You said you addressed it. I pointed out you had not. The reason I angled it as such is because I've had many people here create strawmen in the same way. Also observed many shills in relation to the topic at hand. .
Thank you for acknowledging the issue. If no malice is intended I'll accept that at face value.
You said you addressed it. I pointed out you had not. The reason I angled it as such is because I've had many people here create strawmen in the same way. Also observed many shills in relation to the topic at hand. .
Thank you for acknowledging the issue. If no malice is intended I'll accept that at face value.
(post is archived)