![Evolution of Paintings by Pablo Picasso [600x821 - 89KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/MEYj6l.png){kind=link}
Makes me think of those self-portraits drawn by schizophrenics or artists slipping into dementia.
Makes me think of those self-portraits drawn by schizophrenics or artists slipping into dementia.
It looks like he mastered painting by 14, and spent the rest of his life trying new ways of expression instead of just doing the same boring style for 80 years
It looks like he mastered painting by 14, and spent the rest of his life trying new ways of expression instead of just doing the same boring style for 80 years
plausible explanation, but i dont think thats the entire story. middle and late middle age looks vaguely pornagraphic, and his artstyle towards the end of his life looks like the kind favored by money launderers.
plausible explanation, but i dont think thats the entire story. middle and late middle age looks vaguely pornagraphic, and his artstyle towards the end of his life looks like the kind favored by money launderers.
this and also the first comment, hah
this and also the first comment, hah
He must have got hooked on PCP or something.
He must have got hooked on PCP or something.
Picasso was quite into heavy drugs early on, morphine and opium for instance. But he quit also, before he turned 30
All his life alcohol was part of his diet, but not to the point of drowning into it
So all in all, I don't think that's the main reason why his style "deperished" over time, rather a symptom of something else; self destruction, he was sort of into it, he had a difficult relationship with his father, who thought him how to paint... So, maybe that's not really painting he was "destructuring" in the end... But his relationship to his father, and it showed in what they shared in common, painting
Picasso was quite into heavy drugs early on, morphine and opium for instance. But he quit also, before he turned 30
All his life alcohol was part of his diet, but not to the point of drowning into it
So all in all, I don't think that's the main reason why his style "deperished" over time, rather a symptom of something else; self destruction, he was sort of into it, he had a difficult relationship with his father, who thought him how to paint... So, maybe that's not really painting he was "destructuring" in the end... But his relationship to his father, and it showed in what they shared in common, painting
What was he smoking ?
What was he smoking ?
As much as I don’t like the change, a big part of the modern art scene that he helped create is pushing the limits of form and expression, and breaking free from the structured disciple of the old world.
Artists started to discover you can expres much feeling and emotion through the bastardization and purposeful misrepresentation of form, which focuses more on the concept of the art rather than the image itself.
Unfortunately, architecture, music, and all other forms of creation started to do the same thing, which ruined our societal aesthetic in my opinion
As much as I don’t like the change, a big part of the modern art scene that he helped create is pushing the limits of form and expression, and breaking free from the structured disciple of the old world.
Artists started to discover you can expres much feeling and emotion through the bastardization and purposeful misrepresentation of form, which focuses more on the *concept* of the art rather than the image itself.
Unfortunately, architecture, music, and all other forms of creation started to do the same thing, which ruined our societal aesthetic in my opinion
devolution
*d*evolution
This has nothing to do with Picasso and everything to do with consumers ... basically people like you.
The guy was so talented at 14 that he could paint masterpieces and no one wanted to pay for that. Why? Because in his day EVERYONE (all the other skilled painters) could paint realistic portraits. There was no 'hook' that he could use to get anyone to pay for a HUGE AMOUNT OF WORK, there is no way to stand out when all other painters can paint like you and really no one really buys art to begin with.
So: if you are a fucking genius at the age of 14 and can match the masters but you cannot get any of the retarded public to pay you? Well, you give the retarded public what they want. First you segment the demo and you segment your self into money. Poor people are fucking retarded, rich people are not smart but they are are a softer target with lots of disposable income kind of falling out of their pockets. Next, you segment your art work into something unique, catchy and arresting. For someone that was a master painter at 14, he had not only the technique and know how to make anything, he had the technique and know how on how to decompose his work into its component parts and recombine them in ways that were arresting and interesting to JUST THE RIGHT MARKET SEGMENT: the rich and the intellectuals. Next, you brand your self, so you do everything Picasso did, from getting into the right galleries, getting to know the right intellectuals and art critics and fooling them with bullshit (intellectuals are just fucking retards with degrees) and the reason you do this is to have them jumpstart your marketing with social proof. At first you start to sell a few things, then you sell a few more for a few more dollars, then people that originally bought your shit for nothing start to sell your shit for huge sums and then you sell a whole ton of work for a whole lot of money. And, at the end, the rich and their intellectual pets get to pretend they have a clue and Picasso gets to live a life of luxury and hedonism as the French are wont to do.
This works everywhere, at all strata of human society. Just look at the average iq level of the comments in this thread. Not a single person seems to even know the history of Picasso, never mind the skills and genius needed to be a master by the age of 14, let alone figure out how to market your trinkets and make millions retiring on the Côte d'Azur.
If you are ever wondering why our side keeps on losing, just read the comments on this thread.
If you don't know why you are always losing or what any of the above means, start a business and grow it. You will soon discover that the average consumer is infuriatingly retarded and the cause of all the bad decisions made in the market place.
Everything sucks because that is all that you are willing to pay for.
This has nothing to do with Picasso and everything to do with consumers ... basically people like you.
The guy was so talented at 14 that he could paint masterpieces and no one wanted to pay for that. Why? Because in his day EVERYONE (all the other skilled painters) could paint realistic portraits. There was no 'hook' that he could use to get anyone to pay for a HUGE AMOUNT OF WORK, there is no way to stand out when all other painters can paint like you and really no one really buys art to begin with.
So: if you are a fucking genius at the age of 14 and can match the masters but you cannot get any of the retarded public to pay you? Well, you give the retarded public what they want. First you segment the demo and you segment your self into money. Poor people are fucking retarded, rich people are not smart but they are are a softer target with lots of disposable income kind of falling out of their pockets. Next, you segment your art work into something unique, catchy and arresting. For someone that was a master painter at 14, he had not only the technique and know how to make anything, he had the technique and know how on how to decompose his work into its component parts and recombine them in ways that were arresting and interesting to JUST THE RIGHT MARKET SEGMENT: the rich and the intellectuals. Next, you brand your self, so you do everything Picasso did, from getting into the right galleries, getting to know the right intellectuals and art critics and fooling them with bullshit (intellectuals are just fucking retards with degrees) and the reason you do this is to have them jumpstart your marketing with social proof. At first you start to sell a few things, then you sell a few more for a few more dollars, then people that originally bought your shit for nothing start to sell your shit for huge sums and then you sell a whole ton of work for a whole lot of money. And, at the end, the rich and their intellectual pets get to pretend they have a clue and Picasso gets to live a life of luxury and hedonism as the French are wont to do.
This works everywhere, at all strata of human society. Just look at the average iq level of the comments in this thread. Not a single person seems to even know the history of Picasso, never mind the skills and genius needed to be a master by the age of 14, let alone figure out how to market your trinkets and make millions retiring on the Côte d'Azur.
If you are ever wondering why our side keeps on losing, just read the comments on this thread.
If you don't know why you are always losing or what any of the above means, start a business and grow it. You will soon discover that the average consumer is infuriatingly retarded and the cause of all the bad decisions made in the market place.
Everything sucks because that is all that you are willing to pay for.
(post is archived)