WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

1.4K

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] 4 pts

"In this book, handwritten scribal records – the ‘oldest known explicitly dated Egyptian documents’ – pick up the story of the middle-ranking inspector Merer and his 40-man naval gang. Merer was the captain of ‘Team Great’, an elite, adaptable outfit that transported the ‘grunt’ labour force and maintained the waterways around Giza, ferried limestone blocks up and down the Nile, provisioned and managed stores at the plateau and undertook expeditions to Sinai and Punt – lands, if not of milk and honey, of turquoise, myrrh and much needed copper for stone-working tools. ‘The builders of the gigantic pyramids of the 4th Dynasty must have amassed more copper... than was being accumulated anywhere else in the world.’"

(...much needed copper for stone working tools.) I call BS. Regardless of records, the facts are copper cannot cut granite and is almost always softer than limestone. Whatever the records are, they aren't records of obelisk or pyramid building.

[–] 2 pts

100% guarantee this is complete bullshit. The geological record (water erosion) and stellar alignment proves the great pyramids are at least 13,000 years old. Making them pre-flood (Younger Dryas Event).

We don't know who or how they were built. But it sure as fuck wasn't kangs.

[–] 1 pt

Ancient race of giants built them millions of years ago. It's the only thing that makes sense. There's hard evidence that giants did walk the earth.

[–] 0 pt

I agree about giants. Don't know about millions of years or that they built them. But who knows.

[–] 0 pt
[–] 1 pt (edited )

No he didn't. Anyone believing that's how it was done have black level IQs.

Weight and scale and terrain are all significant factors. All of these stories which claim we know how they did it always prove to be complete bullshit. Doing something at lesser scales in ideal situations doesn't mean anything at all. That's what people fail to understand.

For example, we're often told log rollers were used. In reality, the hardest woods, which wasn't available, would have literally crushed and splintered under the sheer weight of many of these stones. A fact completely ignored and obscured by these bullshit, "this is how it was done", fantasy stories.

Nevermind there is overwhelming evidence of advanced tooling. For example, stone cutting saws. Which immediately invalidates the concept of copper tooling and so on.

This is really about rewriting history to hide the past of us the very people destroying the world today.

It's just more revisionist bullshit, like those claiming we never landed on the moon.

[+] [deleted] 1 pt
[–] 0 pt

Not aliens, but super human bio-engineered Nordic time travelers AKA Paledians but really just ancient humans that learned time travel and zero point energy, and branched out throughout the solar system. These pyramid structures are found elsewhere such as on the dark side of the Moon, on Mars, and subterraneously. They were also prominent structures found on Atlantis before it was destroyed by warring factions (much like Mars).

[–] 0 pt

I still think it was aliens

[–] 0 pt

And does the papyri indicate how they made their precision cuts?

[–] 0 pt

Sandstone is relatively soft, once the blocks are cut roughly into shape they can be ground to perfection with harder rocks. Lots of elbow grease.