WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

151

Remember: (((vaccinations)))

Remember: (((vaccinations)))

(post is archived)

[–] -2 pt

this is fake news used to push a narrative. they know 90% of ppl wont bother reading it at all and just assume a long post with links means its true. 9.9% will read it and just believe it without verifying any of the links. (after all you have to type the url all out yourself), and 0.01% will try to read the studies but may lack the background to fully understand what the study means.

I skimmed one of the links (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22525386/) and I dont think the conclusion drawn in the original post is true. TIV is just one type of vaccine used while CAIV-T is another mentioned by other articles that seem to be safer. What's the difference? I have no idea. (also, this study relates to kids with asthma, not the general population). there are thousands of studies and you can basically cherrypick whichever you want to fit your narrative.

[–] 1 pt

supporting (((vaccines)))

Fuck off. By default you're wrong.

[–] 0 pt

It's literally in the abstract. You're either a shill or an illiterate mongoloid.

> There was an overall trend toward higher rates of hospitalization in subjects who got the TIV when compared with the ones who did not get the TIV (odds ratio [OR], 3.67; CI, 1.6, 8.4). Using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test for asthma status stratification, there was a significant association between hospitalization in asthmatic subjects and TIV (p = 0.001). TIV did not provide any protection against hospitalization in pediatric subjects, especially children with asthma. On the contrary, we found a threefold increased risk of hospitalization in subjects who did get the TIV vaccine.