I posted a genuine answer to your comment, I’m sorry the you seem to disagree but in a large portion of the US this content is illegal. So it won’t be allowed here.
WikiPedia seems to disagree about the legality of posessing it (Legality of zoophile porn in the United States (possession): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Legality_of_zoophile_porn_in_the_United_States.svg) other than for you it may be able to be construed as distribution(?) but IANAL (Legality of sale and distribution of zoophilic pornography in the United States: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8b/Legality_of_sale_and_distribution_of_zoophilic_pornography_in_the_United_States.svg/341px-Legality_of_sale_and_distribution_of_zoophilic_pornography_in_the_United_States.svg.png) and thus a grey area as you are linking to it. Major search engines link to it also if you search for it, so what's the difference. If you don't want it here, are making the judgement call, or want the potential legal liabilities then that's understandable but you should be transparent beyond "I see yellow and red so..."
I would say that if you want to post a video that has caught someone fucking a goat or a news story about it that is probably fine, but if you want to post bestiality porn, no thats not speech.
(post is archived)