AOU and PMYB2 believe that AmRen is spam
It has nothing to do with believing.
Further, apparently, there were two people who would spam amren articles here on poal.
Two accounts related to that website, and they both literally stopped posting right after they realized the domain was banned for spamming.
Last I heard they had been spoken to.
We never heard from them and they never replied to our PMs.
Until the https://amren .com url censorship ceases
Once again, you are being dishonest here. That's not censorship, that's spam prevention.
I've been assured by PMYB2 that they'll reinstate amren "soon" (although that was circa 3?4? months ago)
Well amren website staff is still stealing entire articles from other websites and repost them in their website filled with adsense and banners everywhere.
We did this to several other accounts that were only spamming domains who are doing the exact same thing. Why should amren get a special treatment?
Well amren website staff is still stealing entire articles from other websites and repost them in their website filled with adsense and banners everywhere.
ZeroHedge does that too though... As does (((USConservative))) on his own like 5 sites now. I understand and completely agree with the blocking of amrem until they stop being kike.posters. But why not the two I listed as well?
Because you need to check the difference between copypasta and editorialized content.
Before I blocked all of his domains USconservative never editorialized. Never. Has he finally started? ZeroHedge, eh, if you think so you're the admin.
That user has websites? I never noticed.
I stopped counting but it's like 3+.
Once again, you are being dishonest here. That's not censorship, that's spam prevention.
I don't appreciate the insult. It's not true at all. You and I have different perspectives as to what is spam and what is censorship, but you don't see me insulting you because your perspective differs from mine.
I don't appreciate the insult.
Well I'm sorry if accurate words hurt your feelings.
Dishonest: Lacking truthfulness;
That's exactly what it is. You wouldn't see me coming to your website and calling out censorship because you banned a domain that steals articles from other places and reposts them with tons of ads. So don't accuse poal of censorship when what we do is spam prevention.
The behavior of the two above mentioned accounts was pretty clear that their intention was to spam and nothing else.
I think dishonest implies active deceit rather than simply being incorrect.
The articles are properly attributed, both from the home page and at the top of the article itself. So its not stealing, its the same thing that MSN, Yahoo, Google News would do with AP, UPI, Reuters. In short, theyre legitimate and they have full articles of current events.
Example of attribution:
All news websites have ads. And all news sources change their advertising purveyors over time to be optimal for their site, in addition they only use two 3rd party domains for static, non-popup ads, ad.style and powerad.ai. Their advertisement strategy and implementation is not akin to porn websites. It is now the users responsibility for Network Filters, and the userbase here is predominantly within the 5% of browser users that utilize adblocking.
Those spammer accounts are long gone. Amren would probably be posted several times a month.
Thanks for your concern, but even though you seem really concerned about it, you are missing important details.
Ah, I see. Re: stealing and monetizing: I would venture to say that they have to pay to re-publish those articles, else theyd be sunk in lawsuit hell years ago. I will verify this directly from them.
My initial curiosity was due to not being able to post a link. I checked the sitelog, and there it was, oddly amidst hundreds of other URLs that were obviously spammy, I looked at some of those too to see if it wasnt an oddity. Turns out, it didnt make sense that AmRen was there, thus my shitpants protest of days ago. I was not aware of the precedents as to why. However, its still the only outlier of all the banned domains.
Update: enquired. I will append their response here.
I don't think you should block it in comments, though.
Ban is global for a reason.
Also, the two staffers who had an account here and abandoned them when the domain was banned never reached out to us (admins).
It's clear their intent was just to get traffic to their website. And as I mentioned before, I'm pretty sure Mr Taylor has no idea about that and is probably too busy to care.
Oh, it was actually staffers. Prob trying to "prove their worth". Maybe if you learn Japanese Jared will make it a priority to converse with you.
(post is archived)