Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.0K

Archive: https://archive.today/GbdUn

From the post:

>It’s becoming somewhat of a theme that machine-generated content – whether it’s code, text or graphics – keeps pushing people to their limits, mostly by how such ‘AI slop’ is generally of outrageously poor quality, but as in the case of [Vincent Driessen] there’s also a clear copyright infringement angle involved. Recently he found that Microsoft had bastardized a Git explainer graphic which he had in 2010 painstakingly made by hand, with someone at Microsoft slapping it on a Microsoft Learn explainer article pertaining to GitHub.

Archive: https://archive.today/GbdUn From the post: >>It’s becoming somewhat of a theme that machine-generated content – whether it’s code, text or graphics – keeps pushing people to their limits, mostly by how such ‘AI slop’ is generally of outrageously poor quality, but as in the case of [Vincent Driessen] there’s also a clear copyright infringement angle involved. Recently he found that Microsoft had bastardized a Git explainer graphic which he had in 2010 painstakingly made by hand, with someone at Microsoft slapping it on a Microsoft Learn explainer article pertaining to GitHub.
[–] • 1 pt

Microsoft updated . They replaced the AI slop diagram with the original one and linked to the original article.

It’s a decent correction, but why would anyone rely on articles written by idiots (or AI) that need the internet to proof read for them?

[–] • 1 pt

AI might actually be worse at doing things than the pooniggers running it.

[–] • 0 pt

Only when the shitskins are the ones running it....