WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

Archive: https://archive.today/qMb8T

From the post:

>We’re nearing what feels like the top of the AI bubble. Over the last few years, the IT industry has been under constant fear that AI will take our jobs. Nowadays it seems like the narative has shifted a bit towards “AI is here to stay, but will be used as a tool instead of replacing jobs”. There is still a lot of momentum going on though, companies are still pushing engineers to start using AI more and more in the hope that it will make them more productive. And to some degree it works and CEOs are happy that they can pay $100-$500/mo in AI credits to double or triple the output of a senior engineer instead of hiring more and paying full salaries. Not to mention that no one is hiring juniors to train them anymore.

Archive: https://archive.today/qMb8T From the post: >>We’re nearing what feels like the top of the AI bubble. Over the last few years, the IT industry has been under constant fear that AI will take our jobs. Nowadays it seems like the narative has shifted a bit towards “AI is here to stay, but will be used as a tool instead of replacing jobs”. There is still a lot of momentum going on though, companies are still pushing engineers to start using AI more and more in the hope that it will make them more productive. And to some degree it works and CEOs are happy that they can pay $100-$500/mo in AI credits to double or triple the output of a senior engineer instead of hiring more and paying full salaries. Not to mention that no one is hiring juniors to train them anymore.
[–] 1 pt

maybe idiocracy will save us from digital enslavement ?

hopefully microsoft will fire all theyr developers and run only on AI "coders"

[–] 0 pt

The problem is that until recently most of the "people" training the AI were extremely low paid idiots from the 3rd world. Some of the "AI"s are still being trained by those people.

You can't have AI's when they are trained by the worst of us.