Archive: https://archive.today/qMb8T
From the post:
>We’re nearing what feels like the top of the AI bubble. Over the last few years, the IT industry has been under constant fear that AI will take our jobs. Nowadays it seems like the narative has shifted a bit towards “AI is here to stay, but will be used as a tool instead of replacing jobs”.
There is still a lot of momentum going on though, companies are still pushing engineers to start using AI more and more in the hope that it will make them more productive. And to some degree it works and CEOs are happy that they can pay $100-$500/mo in AI credits to double or triple the output of a senior engineer instead of hiring more and paying full salaries. Not to mention that no one is hiring juniors to train them anymore.
Archive: https://archive.today/qMb8T
From the post:
>>We’re nearing what feels like the top of the AI bubble. Over the last few years, the IT industry has been under constant fear that AI will take our jobs. Nowadays it seems like the narative has shifted a bit towards “AI is here to stay, but will be used as a tool instead of replacing jobs”.
There is still a lot of momentum going on though, companies are still pushing engineers to start using AI more and more in the hope that it will make them more productive. And to some degree it works and CEOs are happy that they can pay $100-$500/mo in AI credits to double or triple the output of a senior engineer instead of hiring more and paying full salaries. Not to mention that no one is hiring juniors to train them anymore.