I sort of agree. I have been tinkering with agents and various LLM's but without having a good understanding of HOW to achieve what you want, you are not likely to be successful using a LLM/Agent for programming or data tasks.
Just because you give a nigger a computer, doesn't mean he can create Amazon/Microsoft/etc.
Archive: https://archive.today/3gdAi
From the post:
>Using AI agents correctly is a process of reviewing code. If you’re good at reviewing code, you’ll be good at using tools like Claude Code, Codex, or the Copilot coding agent.
Why is that? Large language models are good at producing a lot of code, but they don’t yet have the depth of judgement of a competent software engineer. Left unsupervised, they will spend a lot of time committing to bad design decisions.
I sort of agree. I have been tinkering with agents and various LLM's but without having a good understanding of HOW to achieve what you want, you are not likely to be successful using a LLM/Agent for programming or data tasks.
Just because you give a nigger a computer, doesn't mean he can create Amazon/Microsoft/etc.
Archive: https://archive.today/3gdAi
From the post:
>>Using AI agents correctly is a process of reviewing code. If you’re good at reviewing code, you’ll be good at using tools like Claude Code, Codex, or the Copilot coding agent.
Why is that? Large language models are good at producing a lot of code, but they don’t yet have the depth of judgement of a competent software engineer. Left unsupervised, they will spend a lot of time committing to bad design decisions.
(post is archived)