WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

889

… Because people are amazingly stupid, it's almost certain that people have already asked the bot for advice about enormously consequential questions about, say, murder or drug charges.

According to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, anyone's who's done so has made a massive error — because unlike a human lawyer with whom you enjoy sweeping confidentiality protections, ChatGPT conversations can be used against you in court.

[direct link](https://futurism.com/chatgpt-legal-questions-court) > … Because people are amazingly stupid, it's almost certain that people have already asked the bot for advice about enormously consequential questions about, say, murder or drug charges. > > According to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, anyone's who's done so has made a massive error — because unlike a human lawyer with whom you enjoy sweeping confidentiality protections, ChatGPT conversations can be used against you in court.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

According to OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, anyone's who's done so has made a massive error

Well, that sister raping jew certainly didn't ask chatGPT on how to evade child rape charges.

[–] 0 pt

Links?

[–] 1 pt

Ann Altman, the younger sister of OpenAI’s chief executive and founder, Sam Altman, filed a lawsuit in a Missouri federal court on Monday accusing him of sexually abusing her when she was a minor.

The suit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, said that the abuse occurred in the Altmans’ family home outside St. Louis from 1997 to 2006 and started when Ms. Altman was 3 years old.

https://archive.ph/JqPlY

[–] 0 pt

If I just read things without sharing them here I would miss out on important context like this.

[–] 1 pt

Huh. Who'd of figured that communications of a personal nature with a chat-bot would be recorded and saved for future use against you.

Color me shocked.

[–] 1 pt

Like many here, I save that knowledge and for future might ask chapGPT many stupid questions if ever I'm in a lawsuit so that the other party will pay for pages and pages of crap to read thru.

[–] 0 pt

Thank you for the direct link. The Archive link wanted to verify a robot wasn't wanting to view an article about AI.

[–] 1 pt

I try not to exclude our robot friends.