Seems right from my own experience.
Seems right from my own experience.
After analyzing data about 25,000 workers across 7,000 workspaces, users of AI only saved on average three percent of time. And only a meager three to seven percent of those productivity gains translated into bigger paychecks, they found.
…
Earlier this month, an IBM survey found that only a fraction of AI initiatives are delivering a return on investment after surveying 2,000 CEOs.
[direct link](https://futurism.com/time-workers-save-ai-jobs)
> After analyzing data about 25,000 workers across 7,000 workspaces, users of AI only saved on average three percent of time. And only a meager three to seven percent of those productivity gains translated into bigger paychecks, they found.
…
> Earlier this month, an IBM survey found that only a fraction of AI initiatives are delivering a return on investment after surveying 2,000 CEOs.
I never ask AI to tell me how something works, or what a particular law, rule or regulation is. All I use it for is basically a search engine and ask it to point me to the exact spot from a reputable site where the information is contained. Everytime I have tried to ask it something technical, it gave me a stupid answer that was clearly wrong to anyone who knows a bit about the subject.
I never ask AI to tell me how something works, or what a particular law, rule or regulation is. All I use it for is basically a search engine and ask it to point me to the exact spot from a reputable site where the information is contained. Everytime I have tried to ask it something technical, it gave me a stupid answer that was clearly wrong to anyone who knows a bit about the subject.
That’s the trick with LLMs. You have to figure out what they’re actually good for. They can be decent tools, but never employee replacements.
That’s the trick with LLMs. You have to figure out what they’re actually good for. They can be decent tools, but never employee replacements.
(post is archived)