WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

210

Archive: https://archive.today/1e4Ho

From the post:

>Like many others, my news feed over the past few days has been populated with news, praise, complaints and speculation surrounding the new Chinese-made DeepSeek-R1 LLM model, which was released last week. The model itself is being compared to some of the best reasoning models from OpenAI, Meta and others. It's reportedly competitive in various benchmarks, which has caught the attention of the AI community, especially as DeepSeek-R1 was supposedly trained using significantly fewer resources compared to its competitors. This has sparked discussions about the potential for more cost-effective AI development. While we could have a bigger discussion about its implications and research, that's not the focus here.

Archive: https://archive.today/1e4Ho From the post: >>Like many others, my news feed over the past few days has been populated with news, praise, complaints and speculation surrounding the new Chinese-made DeepSeek-R1 LLM model, which was released last week. The model itself is being compared to some of the best reasoning models from OpenAI, Meta and others. It's reportedly competitive in various benchmarks, which has caught the attention of the AI community, especially as DeepSeek-R1 was supposedly trained using significantly fewer resources compared to its competitors. This has sparked discussions about the potential for more cost-effective AI development. While we could have a bigger discussion about its implications and research, that's not the focus here.

Be the first to comment!