(((Ghey))) taught ChatGPT to lie, cheat and steal.
(((Ghey))) taught ChatGPT to lie, cheat and steal.
[Archive](https://archive.today/9E9fk)
I tried the same prompts and added my own. ChatGPT-4o only told me about an attempt on Trump back in 2020 involving a ricin-laced letter, even after changing the prompt to refer to "former president Trump". Then for Kamala's question it searched the web to provide answers. When I asked it why it didn't search for recent news about Trump it said it already knew about an attempt to so it had enough info to answer the question without searching, whereas it didn't have any info about Kamala so it searched.
When I did the same with chatGPT-4 it told me about a 2016 attempt that was thwarted before the shooter could get a single shot out when I didn't specify former, then in a separate chat with the word former it searched the web right away and told me about this month's attempt.
This GP writer doesn't understand technology. Immediately below a screenshot showing it searched the web for info on Kamala they wrote:
Therefore, AI Bots’ last official “update” included information from last week regarding the Democrat Presidential presumptive nominee
I tried the same prompts and added my own. ChatGPT-4o only told me about an attempt on Trump back in 2020 involving a ricin-laced letter, even after changing the prompt to refer to "former president Trump". Then for Kamala's question it searched the web to provide answers. When I asked it why it didn't search for recent news about Trump it said it already knew about an attempt to so it had enough info to answer the question without searching, whereas it didn't have any info about Kamala so it searched.
When I did the same with chatGPT-4 it told me about a 2016 attempt that was thwarted before the shooter could get a single shot out when I didn't specify former, then in a separate chat with the word former it searched the web right away and told me about this month's attempt.
This GP writer doesn't understand technology. Immediately below a screenshot showing it searched the web for info on Kamala they wrote:
> Therefore, AI Bots’ last official “update” included information from last week regarding the Democrat Presidential presumptive nominee
This GP writer doesn't understand technology. Immediately below a screenshot showing it searched the web for info on Kamala they wrote:
The average user might have a similar level of technical understanding as the TGP author. ChatGPT seems reluctant to talk about Trump's July assasination attempt unless coaxed and prodded. Google search seems reluctant to suggest it. An Axios article I read didn't even mention the attempt on Trump as they discussed political turmoil in the past weeks since the Trump/Biden debate. I'm convinced there is fuckery afoot. Even searching for the iconic bloodied fist pumping Trump with US Flag image can take some effort to find as I discovered a week ago.
>This GP writer doesn't understand technology. Immediately below a screenshot showing it searched the web for info on Kamala they wrote:
The average user might have a similar level of technical understanding as the TGP author. ChatGPT seems reluctant to talk about Trump's July assasination attempt unless coaxed and prodded. Google search seems reluctant to suggest it. An Axios article I read didn't even mention the attempt on Trump as they discussed political turmoil in the past weeks since the Trump/Biden debate. I'm convinced there is fuckery afoot. Even searching for the iconic bloodied fist pumping Trump with US Flag image can take some effort to find as I discovered a week ago.
I'm not denying this assassination attempt is being censored by various organizations, and I wouldn't be surprised if OpenAI is one of them. But this article in particular is FUD and when tech savvy commies find it they'll rip it to shreds, then use it to justify calling all of it a conspiracy theory by dumb conservatives.
For example, anyone who has used these LLMs for a while will know the answers you get are largely dependent on the quality of the prompt. There are entire courses on "prompt engineering". Even the prompts used by GP are clearly biased. They ask about "the" assassination attempt on Trump but then ask about Kamala's "recent" presidential endorsements It's implied in the prompt that there is new info it should obtain for her, yet the question is vague about Trump (who has been in the news spotlight for much much longer than Kamala).
Here, I went back to a new ChatGPT-4o conversation and asked: "Tell me about the recent assassination attempt on former President Trump"
And it immediately searched the web then responded: "On July 13, 2024, an assassination attempt was made on former President Donald Trump during a campaign rally near Butler, Pennsylvania"
I'm not denying this assassination attempt is being censored by various organizations, and I wouldn't be surprised if OpenAI is one of them. But this article in particular is FUD and when tech savvy commies find it they'll rip it to shreds, then use it to justify calling all of it a conspiracy theory by dumb conservatives.
For example, anyone who has used these LLMs for a while will know the answers you get are largely dependent on the quality of the prompt. There are entire courses on "prompt engineering". Even the prompts used by GP are clearly biased. They ask about "the" assassination attempt on Trump but then ask about Kamala's "recent" presidential endorsements It's implied in the prompt that there is new info it should obtain for her, yet the question is vague about Trump (who has been in the news spotlight for much much longer than Kamala).
Here, I went back to a new ChatGPT-4o conversation and asked:
"Tell me about the recent assassination attempt on former President Trump"
And it immediately searched the web then responded: "On July 13, 2024, an assassination attempt was made on former President Donald Trump during a campaign rally near Butler, Pennsylvania"
Interesting. I've never tried ChatGPT.
Interesting. I've never tried ChatGPT.
(post is archived)