Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

639

What could ever possibly go wrong. I am looking forward to seeing the lawsuits challenging the court cases because "AI" wrote the report. Will this be a lead-in to granting AI "personhood"? Those reports are required to be written by actual human people....

Based on the training data I imagine that the software will be instructed to try to write the report in such a way that any White person is extremely likely to be fucked over as much as possible where any non-White person would be let off with a slap on the wrist at worst.

Archive: https://archive.today/ipuJe

From the post:

>In a first for Colorado law enforcement, the Fort Collins Police Services (FCPS) is testing artificial intelligence (AI) to transcribe body camera video and, in turn, speed up report writing time. Following every call, officers must review their body camera video and write up a detailed report. Lengthy or complicated calls can mean more time at a desk and less time in the community. The department said the technology not only saves time but gets officers back out into the community.

What could ever possibly go wrong. I am looking forward to seeing the lawsuits challenging the court cases because "AI" wrote the report. Will this be a lead-in to granting AI "personhood"? Those reports are required to be written by actual human people.... Based on the training data I imagine that the software will be instructed to try to write the report in such a way that any White person is extremely likely to be fucked over as much as possible where any non-White person would be let off with a slap on the wrist at worst. Archive: https://archive.today/ipuJe From the post: >>In a first for Colorado law enforcement, the Fort Collins Police Services (FCPS) is testing artificial intelligence (AI) to transcribe body camera video and, in turn, speed up report writing time. Following every call, officers must review their body camera video and write up a detailed report. Lengthy or complicated calls can mean more time at a desk and less time in the community. The department said the technology not only saves time but gets officers back out into the community.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (5).
[–] • 1 pt

If you’re ever charged with a crime this could be a reason for appeal. The reports are read by prosecutors who base their trial tactics on the content. Why not allow dictated reports? At least then it is the work product of the actual officer. Lazy ass people want illiterates to fill the department, and then no discretion will be permitted; a continuation of mandated sentencing’s purpose.

[–] • 1 pt

You can sue for the program code of a radar gun and a breathalyzer. A software engineer did exactly that for a speeding ticket saying that if he cannot analyze the code that its results cant be verified and are such not admissible. It was a log fight but he eventually won.. and the company refused to give up the code so they had to let him off.

Now. Try to do that with an AI company.. they cant even explain the code themselves in some cases.. at least the model because... they didn't write it and don't even really fully understand how it works.

[–] • 1 pt

What they says is AI isn’t truly AI. There might be monkeys or offshore cheap labor producing the “AI” artifacts. There is no “neural network” or “machine learning”, it’s all fast and fancy databases with some hierarchical ranking to skew results toward the commie/liberal mindset. Garbage in, garbage out…and all that.

[–] • 1 pt

Right, but that is kind of the point right? You sue them over this... The company has to refuse to give you "the code* because it would expose that they are paying ~10 cents/hr for 3rd world people to follow specific guidelines to "train" the model in a specific way.

The current version of "ai" is basically woke/liberal 3rd world slavery to better try to eliminate more jobs and to harm society.