Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

“We are grunt workers, but there would be no AI language systems without it. You can design all the neural networks you want, you can get all the researchers involved you want, but without labelers, you have no ChatGPT. You have nothing.”

...

https://www.quora.com/Can-a-human-win-in-chess-against-a-computer

>...In 2016 Stockfish-8, an open-source chess engine, was the world’s computer chess champion. It evaluated 70 million chess positions per second and had centuries of accumulated human chess strategies and decades of computer experience to draw upon. It played efficiently and brutally, mercilessly beating all its human challengers without an ounce of finesse. Enter deep learning. On Dec. 7, 2017, Google’s deep-learning chess program AlphaZero thrashed Stockfish-8. The chess engines played 100 games, with AlphaZero winning 28 and tying 72. It didn’t lose a single game. AlphaZero did only 80,000 calculations per second, as opposed to Stockfish-8’s 70 million calculations, and it took just four hours to learn chess from scratch by playing against itself a few million times and optimizing its neural networks as it learned from its experience. AlphaZero didn’t learn anything from humans or chess games played by humans. It taught itself and, in the process, derived strategies never seen before. In a commentary in Science magazine, former world chess champion Garry Kasparov wrote that by learning from playing itself, AlphaZero developed strategies that “reflect the truth” of chess rather than reflecting “the priorities and prejudices” of the programmers.“It’s the embodiment of the cliché ‘work smarter, not harder. What is important from all this is the fact that true AI operates on time scales incomprehensible by human standards. AI measures time in nano and micro and milli - seconds instead of hours, days, months and years like humans do! Even a primitive and weak AI (as we have today) operates about 1 million times faster than humans do. 4 human hours is like 450 years for a primitive AI. I shuddered to think what a advanced AI will be like…

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGXHJvEttpE

“We are grunt workers, but there would be no AI language systems without it. You can design all the neural networks you want, you can get all the researchers involved you want, but without labelers, you have no ChatGPT. You have nothing.” ... https://www.quora.com/Can-a-human-win-in-chess-against-a-computer >>...In 2016 Stockfish-8, an open-source chess engine, was the world’s computer chess champion. It evaluated 70 million chess positions per second and had centuries of accumulated human chess strategies and decades of computer experience to draw upon. It played efficiently and brutally, mercilessly beating all its human challengers without an ounce of finesse. Enter deep learning. On Dec. 7, 2017, Google’s deep-learning chess program AlphaZero thrashed Stockfish-8. The chess engines played 100 games, with AlphaZero winning 28 and tying 72. It didn’t lose a single game. **AlphaZero did only 80,000 calculations per second, as opposed to Stockfish-8’s 70 million calculations, and it took just four hours to learn chess from scratch by playing against itself a few million times and optimizing its neural networks as it learned from its experience. AlphaZero didn’t learn anything from humans or chess games played by humans. It taught itself and, in the process, derived strategies never seen before. In a commentary in Science magazine, former world chess champion Garry Kasparov wrote that by learning from playing itself, AlphaZero developed strategies that “reflect the truth” of chess rather than reflecting “the priorities and prejudices” of the programmers.**“It’s the embodiment of the cliché ‘work smarter, not harder. What is important from all this is the fact that true AI operates on time scales incomprehensible by human standards. AI measures time in nano and micro and milli - seconds instead of hours, days, months and years like humans do! Even a primitive and weak AI (as we have today) operates about 1 million times faster than humans do. 4 human hours is like 450 years for a primitive AI. I shuddered to think what a advanced AI will be like… https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGXHJvEttpE

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (1).
[–] • 2 pts

Open source already recreated huge datasets of labelled human/bot conversation pairs for free using volunteers (and released the data).