WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

131

Reverse compilation is 100% possible already. The only problem is how insanely difficult it is. It's also - reverse compilation - nondeterministic like compilation is. This is because of (not only this) for example loops could be many different sources of code, each of which would compile to the same result. This adds extreme difficulty for a human or even basic instructions to solve.

Reverse compilation has been done. I forget which old console system it was done for but a large group of people did and it was successful. Additionally many many games for older systems have been completely or near completely reverse compiled for things like emulation and, as odd as it sounds, speed running.

The point of contention here, the fear, is that an AI would be able to reverse compile something as large and valuable as an entire operating system, windows 11, osX, jewgle's android etc. The reason is one that's already well known, I hope. Viruses and 0days aren't created by malicious 3rd parties, they're created by the 1st party themselves, those who already have the keys to the proverbial castle. With a successfully revers compiled OS for example. That could be completely prevented, in addition all the (((nsa))) and (((cia))) backdoors could be removed while still offering what people actually wanted and with absolutely n o way for an outside party to determine a decompiled copy versus a standard copy.

Just my thoughts.

Reverse compilation is 100% possible already. The only problem is how insanely difficult it is. It's also - reverse compilation - nondeterministic like compilation is. This is because of (not only this) for example loops could be many different sources of code, each of which would compile to the same result. This adds extreme difficulty for a human or even basic instructions to solve. Reverse compilation has been done. I forget which old console system it was done for but a large group of people did and it was successful. Additionally many many games for older systems have been completely or near completely reverse compiled for things like emulation and, as odd as it sounds, speed running. The point of contention here, the fear, is that an AI would be able to reverse compile something as large and valuable as an entire operating system, windows 11, osX, jewgle's android etc. The reason is one that's already well known, I hope. Viruses and 0days aren't created by malicious 3rd parties, they're created by the 1st party themselves, those who already have the keys to the proverbial castle. With a successfully revers compiled OS for example. That could be completely prevented, in addition all the (((nsa))) and (((cia))) backdoors could be removed while still offering what people actually wanted and with absolutely n o way for an outside party to determine a decompiled copy versus a standard copy. Just my thoughts.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Interesting observation. What is some of the fallout of this happening, a move to open source code? Would we be able to see how state actors gain backdoor access to exisiting systems?

[–] 0 pt

A global law against access to and use of AI by nonjews, among other restrictions to further the main one. Making it illegal to decompile something. I don't know really, that's just guessing off of a guess.

[–] 0 pt

That wouldn't stop law breakers unfortunately and once it's out in the wild there's no putting the genie back in the bottle but it's something I guess.

[–] 0 pt

Which is one of the reasons it's being pushed (stopping AI) now rather than then.

[–] 0 pt

Crowdstrike will probably usurp and copyright all the best AI decompilers.