Best idea i've seen in a while | Poal: Say what you want.

Teitter allows leftists blocklists, as does reddit. Started with that horrible ggautoblocker from Randi Harper, the meth addict who tried to sell her infant on the internet and faked being a BSD dev by flirting with simps to become a maintainer and getting other simps to write her commits for her.

parent
link

[–] • 2 pts

Best new slur for Canadians: SYRUP NIGGER

link

[–] • 1 pt

That's hilarious:)

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

The whole 4chan thread is golden

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

Maple Nigger

Snowback

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

Or Chinese and Somalians.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

....bruh... that's not new. welcome to the internet.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

I have always called them 'leafniggers'

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

🤣

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

Doesn't everyone know who's who and what's what in their home county?

link

[–] • 0 pt

Not the little fish. It'd be amazing to have a database where you search who's got it coming within 50 miles or so. Everyone would have an easy vent for their anger and every pos would be afraid.

parent
link

[–] • 1 pt

Put it on a Block Chain. Then it will be impossible to get rig of, since it will be a distributed though out million computers.

https://www.devteam.space/blog/how-to-use-blockchain-to-build-a-scalable-database/

link

[–] • 0 pt

Yeah, that would make it hard to get rig of alright.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

That may work.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

I said we need a database of local and state officials, the ceos and board of directors that are gleefully enforcing mandates, hospitals, doctors and nurses, medical and pharmacy boards we already know all the feds and bureaucrats are corrupt so that part is easy.

The last list back in 2014-2015 was removed after being deemed a “hit list”. You wouldn’t be able to host a list like this anywhere except a home server and then expect a 3am raid.

Even searching for addresses of certain people will get you flagged and your info turned over to the feds. You’d have to follow them or know someone who lives by them.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

Everyone always says the wrong search gets you raided. Are there any times this actually happened?

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

This is the FBI only, I’m sure other agencies are doing the same and even more remember when the NSA gave the dea all the info on certain drug dealers and told them they couldn’t use the data but could reverse engineer the data to put cases together and nobody would know.

You had Snowden who leaked that big tech was working with government agencies and spying on all of us.

A big one that just leaked:

Accidental leak reveals US government has secretly hit Google with 'keyword warrants' to identify ANYONE searching certain names, addresses, and phone numbers

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10063665/Government-orders-Google-track-searching-certain-names-addresses-phone-numbers.html

These are just for nobody’s

https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2021/10/04/google-keyword-warrants-give-us-government-data-on-search-users/?sh=4066f8627c97

Using your gps data for a year old burglary:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/sep/16/geofence-warrants-reverse-search-warrants-police-google

High profile:

But one thing the FBI did was unusual. According to an affidavit from Special Agent Andrew Mitchell, the bureau asked Google to turn over records on anyone who had searched for particular terms associated with the Russian hackers—"dcleaks," "guccifer" and ''guccifer june.” The records allowed investigators to determine that Stone, from a computer in Florida, appeared to have searched for some of these phrases prior to the publication of the leaked emails from Guccifer and DCLeaks, indicating he had prior knowledge of their disclosure.

Patrick Toomey, a senior staff attorney at the American Civil Liberties Union, said he has never seen the FBI publicly admit to using this method before. For him, the disclosure raised some important questions: Is the FBI now routinely identifying criminal suspects on the basis of search terms they have entered into Google? And is that constitutional under the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures?

This is the FBI only, I’m sure other agencies are doing the same and even more remember when the NSA gave the dea all the info on certain drug dealers and told them they couldn’t use the data but could reverse engineer the data to put cases together and nobody would know. You had Snowden who leaked that big tech was working with government agencies and spying on all of us. A big one that just leaked: >**Accidental leak reveals US government has secretly hit Google with 'keyword warrants' to identify ANYONE searching certain names, addresses, and phone numbers** https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10063665/Government-orders-Google-track-searching-certain-names-addresses-phone-numbers.html These are just for nobody’s https://www.forbes.com/sites/thomasbrewster/2021/10/04/google-keyword-warrants-give-us-government-data-on-search-users/?sh=4066f8627c97 Using your gps data for a year old burglary: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/sep/16/geofence-warrants-reverse-search-warrants-police-google High profile: >But one thing the FBI did was unusual. According to an affidavit from Special Agent Andrew Mitchell, the bureau asked Google to turn over records on anyone who had searched for particular terms associated with the Russian hackers—"dcleaks," "guccifer" and ''guccifer june.” The records allowed investigators to determine that Stone, from a computer in Florida, appeared to have searched for some of these phrases prior to the publication of the leaked emails from Guccifer and DCLeaks, indicating he had prior knowledge of their disclosure. >Patrick Toomey, a senior staff attorney at the American Civil Liberties Union, **said he has never seen the FBI publicly admit to using this method before. For him, the disclosure raised some important questions: Is the FBI now routinely identifying criminal suspects on the basis of search terms they have entered into Google?** And is that constitutional under the Fourth Amendment, which protects against unreasonable searches and seizures?

parent
link

Load more (1 reply)

[–] • 0 pt

like that Jew who keeps a record of declining white birth rates in his office).

The white population was supposed to level off in the next decade or two and start increasing again. It’s just white baby boomers deaths outnumber new white births.

But with the vaxxes, who knows what lays ahead for fertility even a few generations down the line.