Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

1.1K

Communism is based on the idea that the state completely owns all corporations and all forms of production. In return they would promise to ensure a livable wage, free education and free healthcare etc. This leads to 99% of the population living just barely above poverty level, while those that are in powerful positions in government or at least well-connected to those in power to become fabulously wealthy. The level of taxation levied upon these poor souls to accomplish this ensured that the masses were poor and stayed poor their entire lives.

With National Socialism a person that founds a company or corporation gets to retain full ownership of said company. The wealth of the company is still distributed out amongst it’s employees, but in a drastically different manner. Much more beneficial to all involved. Lets use the analogy of a pirate ship crew. Pirate ships operated on a share by share basis. Yes the captain might get 10 or even more shares of the booty they collected, but if they captured a ship loaded with gold for example, even the single share that the deck hands and galley hands would get could be a small fortune. Likewise if a company was very successful and made billions of dollars, like many of today’s companies do, the single share that the janitors or night watchmen would get could be enormous sums of money. Name one other form of government where a janitor can afford a large house, fancy cars, multiple children and still afford to send them all to college as well. You can’t. There aren’t any.

This method of guaranteeing even the lowliest of employees would enjoy a full share of the company’s profits easily explains the level of fervent fanaticism Hitler enjoyed from his followers. The effectiveness of National Socialism is beyond debate as seen by how Hitler was able to take a country that had not only been utterly decimated in World War One, but incessantly raped and pillaged by the Jewish elite bankers such as the Rothchild’s after the war during the Weimar Republic. In a mere 12 years he took this ragged husk of a nation and rebuilt it to be the single most powerful nation in the world by the beginning of World War Two. There existed some forms of taxation in Hitler’s Germany, but most of that came directly from the companies making huge profits. Not on the backs of the individual. Other than military and infrastructure spending, most of these taxes were used to help the population have bigger families. For example, when you purchased a home the state would pay for 25% of your house once you had a child. If you continued to have more children you would have your entire mortgage paid off by the state upon the birth of your fourth child. Many other forms of assistance were geared towards helping the people be able to afford to have large families as well.

Exactly the same right?

Communism is based on the idea that the state completely owns all corporations and all forms of production. In return they would promise to ensure a livable wage, free education and free healthcare etc. This leads to 99% of the population living just barely above poverty level, while those that are in powerful positions in government or at least well-connected to those in power to become fabulously wealthy. The level of taxation levied upon these poor souls to accomplish this ensured that the masses were poor and stayed poor their entire lives. With National Socialism a person that founds a company or corporation gets to retain full ownership of said company. The wealth of the company is still distributed out amongst it’s employees, but in a drastically different manner. Much more beneficial to all involved. Lets use the analogy of a pirate ship crew. Pirate ships operated on a share by share basis. Yes the captain might get 10 or even more shares of the booty they collected, but if they captured a ship loaded with gold for example, even the single share that the deck hands and galley hands would get could be a small fortune. Likewise if a company was very successful and made billions of dollars, like many of today’s companies do, the single share that the janitors or night watchmen would get could be enormous sums of money. Name one other form of government where a janitor can afford a large house, fancy cars, multiple children and still afford to send them all to college as well. You can’t. There aren’t any. This method of guaranteeing even the lowliest of employees would enjoy a full share of the company’s profits easily explains the level of fervent fanaticism Hitler enjoyed from his followers. The effectiveness of National Socialism is beyond debate as seen by how Hitler was able to take a country that had not only been utterly decimated in World War One, but incessantly raped and pillaged by the Jewish elite bankers such as the Rothchild’s after the war during the Weimar Republic. In a mere 12 years he took this ragged husk of a nation and rebuilt it to be the single most powerful nation in the world by the beginning of World War Two. There existed some forms of taxation in Hitler’s Germany, but most of that came directly from the companies making huge profits. Not on the backs of the individual. Other than military and infrastructure spending, most of these taxes were used to help the population have bigger families. For example, when you purchased a home the state would pay for 25% of your house once you had a child. If you continued to have more children you would have your entire mortgage paid off by the state upon the birth of your fourth child. Many other forms of assistance were geared towards helping the people be able to afford to have large families as well. Exactly the same right?

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (39).
[–] • 1 pt

God I've been waiting for a post like this for a while, I've always had fags telling me they're both the same, but could never exactly explain why they're not. Then again I'm sure that's my own fault, since all it takes is a simple look into Communism's workings and the National Socialist workings.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts (edited )

What are you talking about? All it would take to debunk OP is to literally just Google how small businesses faired in Nazi Germany (tip: they all got fucked and steamrolled) and look up how workers faired in Nazi Germany (also fucked and steamrolled). The only way to be a National Socialist is to just take every piece of evidence regarding the 4 year plan and the economic conditions of Nazi Germany (which is COMPLETELY coherent by the way), throw it all in the garbage bin and yell "propaganda", and then just shrug your shoulders and say Nazi Germany was "an economic miracle" that cannot be explained (except for with all the evidence I just mentioned).

That's literally the only possible way to believe this, is to take the flat-earther route, where you say millions upon millions of people are just lying, including the people who lived throughout Europe and were there when it happened.

This entire post does not even explain HOW all of this makes sense in any sort of economic terms, just repeatedly insisting "nah bruh, everyone was super free and like, shit was awesome and stuff". That's the culmination of every National Socialist argument. Just hand waving and vague generalizations.

This whole "dude it was like financially wizardry and genius and stuff". It's complete bullshit. And you will never, EVER hear a detailed breakdown from a National Socialist about how that actually occurred. Because the process necessary to MAKE that occur involves some shiesty, shady ass tactics. Period. It's the laws of physics.

It would be like if you're like "hmm. How'd you afford that 200,000 sports car and all these cool new expensive gadgets and clothes and stuff over the past year? Don't you work at McDonalds and weren't you bankrupt a few years ago?" And I'm like "heh...um...I'm good at budgeting and....I work really hard".

Like, no. That is clearly bullshit. But there are probably some stupid fucks who would believe it. Now if you said "well I actually took EVERYTHING I MADE and stockpiled crypto" then okay, we actually have a plausible scenario now.

[–] • 1 pt

I can't remember the last time I googled anything controversial that Google didn't manipulate my search results. Just Google it? lol

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt (edited )

It depends. The more obscure or technical the information you're looking for is, the more reliable it is. It's not like the economic policies of Nazi Germany are a hotly debated topic.

Edit: seriously go search for "Catholic church homosexuality". Manipulated as shit right? Big gay as far as the eye can see. Now go search for any Church Fathers commentary on homosexuality, for example, "thomas aquinas homosexuality". Suddenly exactly what you would expect.

I'm not Catholic btw.