Aww, does tinkin makes yo widdle head hurt? There isn’t likely to be “hard” smoking gun evidence, because the precincts where the fraud occurred have a fantastic ability to stonewall investigations, if they aren’t already successfully evading them in the first place. They also have a miraculous capacity to “lose” any relevant info by mistake. For this reason, surrounding evidence is what remains. This includes rally attendance volume disparities for the “loser,” organic search engine interest data heatmaps, and implausible voter turnout percentages, particularly when large chunks of the voter rolls are clearly erroneous or even outright impossible, and particularly those that run contrary to trends in similar population demographic centers.