WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

158

So you will be ranking them in terms of civilizational competence AND by how much you hate them and WHY. Obviously white Europeans/ pure Aryans reign supreme, so are unnecessary to be included.

Feel free to use whatever definitions and racial categories that you wish, though suggestions are provided on a by need basis.

Race suggestions (in no particular order; unranked by me):

  • Northeast Asians (Koreans, Japanese, Chinese)

  • Southeast Asians (Thai, Khmer, Lao, Vietnamese)

  • South Asians (Indians, Bangladeshis, Pakis)>further subdivisible into Northern Indians (heavily mongrelized Aryans diluted by Dravidian) and Southern Indians (mostly Dravidian)

  • Indigenous Americans>(Canadian First Nations, American Indians);>(Mesoamericans>Aztecs, Maya, Toltec, Olmec);>South Americans (uncontacted tribes, Inca);> Indigenous Caribs/Taino/Arawak;>Ibero-Native(-negroid) hybrids AKA Latinos

  • Eskimo race>Inuit, Yupik

  • Polynesians (Maori, Samoan, Native Hawaiians)

  • Austronesians (indigenous Taiwanese, Malays, Filipinos, Indonesians)

  • sub-Saharan Africans>Bantu, San Bushmen, Pygmies

  • Persians (mongrelized Aryans)

  • Middle Easterners/North Africans>Arabized mongrels;>Levantines

  • Turk(ic)s: Turks, Azeris, Kazakhs, Turkmen, Uighurs, Uzbeks, Kyrgyz (Mongrel Mongoloids with varying percentages of Aryan Slavic or Greek DNA)

PLEASE RESPOND WITH ORGANIZED POINTS, PREFERABLY BULLETED.

So you will be ranking them in terms of civilizational competence AND by how much you hate them and WHY. Obviously white Europeans/ pure Aryans reign supreme, so are unnecessary to be included. Feel free to use whatever definitions and racial categories that you wish, though suggestions are provided on a by need basis. Race suggestions (in no particular order; unranked by me): - Northeast Asians (Koreans, Japanese, Chinese) - Southeast Asians (Thai, Khmer, Lao, Vietnamese) - South Asians (Indians, Bangladeshis, Pakis)>further subdivisible into Northern Indians (heavily mongrelized Aryans diluted by Dravidian) and Southern Indians (mostly Dravidian) - Indigenous Americans>(Canadian First Nations, American Indians);>(Mesoamericans>Aztecs, Maya, Toltec, Olmec);>South Americans (uncontacted tribes, Inca);> Indigenous Caribs/Taino/Arawak;>Ibero-Native(-negroid) hybrids AKA Latinos - Eskimo race>Inuit, Yupik - Polynesians (Maori, Samoan, Native Hawaiians) - Austronesians (indigenous Taiwanese, Malays, Filipinos, Indonesians) - sub-Saharan Africans>Bantu, San Bushmen, Pygmies - Persians (mongrelized Aryans) - Middle Easterners/North Africans>Arabized mongrels;>Levantines - Turk(ic)s: Turks, Azeris, Kazakhs, Turkmen, Uighurs, Uzbeks, Kyrgyz (Mongrel Mongoloids with varying percentages of Aryan Slavic or Greek DNA) PLEASE RESPOND WITH ORGANIZED POINTS, PREFERABLY BULLETED.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt (edited )

Yeah out of africa happened 2 million years ago with erectus not 65k with niggers or 300k with niggers. Modern blacks are pretty much hybrids of erectus and some early modern human (Hs) in different waves. They became more human like each time. There was much more hybridization than you would think going on in ancient hominid history and there were many different species running around at one time. Weird how after 1945 not only was it the first time in homo history that there was one species but one subspecies too! What a coincidence! Right after the evil mustache man and franz boas! Archaic admixture was found in modern niggers in 2018, it completely makes OoA impossible but acadmia will die on the hill of egalitarianism and would never not have niggers be the original man. In reality they are relatively new and were created from introgression into africa. The book predicts what we have found since 2008 when it was written including the into africa introgression and bipedal apes coming from Europe which was shown in 2017 and again in 2019. Out of africa is a complete joke now only pushed by the establishment to keep up the joke that niggers are modern humans. They backtracked from 65k to 300k for their out of africa. In reality the first Hss come from eurasia. The out of eurasia theory is the most sound today. You should read the book, the man is a genius.

[–] 0 pt

Yeah, a lawyer by trade, but with broad interests. I never subscribed to the notion that one must defer to the consensus of experts in a field. If a person lacks a doctorate pertaining to a field, that doesn’t mean he should be immediately dismissed.

[–] 0 pt

It’s weird because people who make breakthroughs in fields are usually not from the field that they were educated in. I think education sort of gets you into this certain way of thinking on a topic and you get into sort of a cage built for you by the status quo. Edward Dutton has a video on this called “why do amateur scientists make groundbreaking discoveries?” His theory is that if you take the traditional route through university you’ll just end up being some cog who might have your name in a few papers as sources if you choose to go the academic route for your field. Modern academia is pretty much a circle jerk of conformity where nobody wants to rock the boat. You want to get those funding dollars and you have to be a good goy to get them. There is a list of people who made discoveries in history who had nothing to do with their field of education. They are just high IQ people who learned how to think than then applied that skill to another field without the ideological blinders that are put on you for going through the traditional academic route for any given field.