Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

721

So you will be ranking them in terms of civilizational competence AND by how much you hate them and WHY. Obviously white Europeans/ pure Aryans reign supreme, so are unnecessary to be included.

Feel free to use whatever definitions and racial categories that you wish, though suggestions are provided on a by need basis.

Race suggestions (in no particular order; unranked by me):

  • Northeast Asians (Koreans, Japanese, Chinese)

  • Southeast Asians (Thai, Khmer, Lao, Vietnamese)

  • South Asians (Indians, Bangladeshis, Pakis)>further subdivisible into Northern Indians (heavily mongrelized Aryans diluted by Dravidian) and Southern Indians (mostly Dravidian)

  • Indigenous Americans>(Canadian First Nations, American Indians);>(Mesoamericans>Aztecs, Maya, Toltec, Olmec);>South Americans (uncontacted tribes, Inca);> Indigenous Caribs/Taino/Arawak;>Ibero-Native(-negroid) hybrids AKA Latinos

  • Eskimo race>Inuit, Yupik

  • Polynesians (Maori, Samoan, Native Hawaiians)

  • Austronesians (indigenous Taiwanese, Malays, Filipinos, Indonesians)

  • sub-Saharan Africans>Bantu, San Bushmen, Pygmies

  • Persians (mongrelized Aryans)

  • Middle Easterners/North Africans>Arabized mongrels;>Levantines

  • Turk(ic)s: Turks, Azeris, Kazakhs, Turkmen, Uighurs, Uzbeks, Kyrgyz (Mongrel Mongoloids with varying percentages of Aryan Slavic or Greek DNA)

PLEASE RESPOND WITH ORGANIZED POINTS, PREFERABLY BULLETED.

So you will be ranking them in terms of civilizational competence AND by how much you hate them and WHY. Obviously white Europeans/ pure Aryans reign supreme, so are unnecessary to be included. Feel free to use whatever definitions and racial categories that you wish, though suggestions are provided on a by need basis. Race suggestions (in no particular order; unranked by me): - Northeast Asians (Koreans, Japanese, Chinese) - Southeast Asians (Thai, Khmer, Lao, Vietnamese) - South Asians (Indians, Bangladeshis, Pakis)>further subdivisible into Northern Indians (heavily mongrelized Aryans diluted by Dravidian) and Southern Indians (mostly Dravidian) - Indigenous Americans>(Canadian First Nations, American Indians);>(Mesoamericans>Aztecs, Maya, Toltec, Olmec);>South Americans (uncontacted tribes, Inca);> Indigenous Caribs/Taino/Arawak;>Ibero-Native(-negroid) hybrids AKA Latinos - Eskimo race>Inuit, Yupik - Polynesians (Maori, Samoan, Native Hawaiians) - Austronesians (indigenous Taiwanese, Malays, Filipinos, Indonesians) - sub-Saharan Africans>Bantu, San Bushmen, Pygmies - Persians (mongrelized Aryans) - Middle Easterners/North Africans>Arabized mongrels;>Levantines - Turk(ic)s: Turks, Azeris, Kazakhs, Turkmen, Uighurs, Uzbeks, Kyrgyz (Mongrel Mongoloids with varying percentages of Aryan Slavic or Greek DNA) PLEASE RESPOND WITH ORGANIZED POINTS, PREFERABLY BULLETED.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (16).
[–] • 0 pt

Yeah, a lawyer by trade, but with broad interests. I never subscribed to the notion that one must defer to the consensus of experts in a field. If a person lacks a doctorate pertaining to a field, that doesn’t mean he should be immediately dismissed.

[–] • 0 pt

It’s weird because people who make breakthroughs in fields are usually not from the field that they were educated in. I think education sort of gets you into this certain way of thinking on a topic and you get into sort of a cage built for you by the status quo. Edward Dutton has a video on this called “why do amateur scientists make groundbreaking discoveries?” His theory is that if you take the traditional route through university you’ll just end up being some cog who might have your name in a few papers as sources if you choose to go the academic route for your field. Modern academia is pretty much a circle jerk of conformity where nobody wants to rock the boat. You want to get those funding dollars and you have to be a good goy to get them. There is a list of people who made discoveries in history who had nothing to do with their field of education. They are just high IQ people who learned how to think than then applied that skill to another field without the ideological blinders that are put on you for going through the traditional academic route for any given field.