I'm going to have to 'get cynical' on @GetCynical on this one. This is in fact not how Color Revolutions happen at all. In fact what OP is advocating is what would be in line with the Color Revolution Playbook. To be cynical, i have to assume that OP is shilling or themselves a glowie.
The 'left' are the foundation of the color revolution.
Nope. Color revolution is about pitting two ideological factions against each other and capitalizing on the chaos.
A color revolution requires a few key things, chief among them political support.
Nope. Color Revolutions are about disrupting established politics. Political support would make it not a color revolution.
What happens if the left and right unite?
Color revolutions are not about left/right. They are about fomenting conflict between two radical factions, any two factions. Rich vs poor still works
End wall street. Punish it. Bring it down.
This is how glowies do it folks. Its about setting a bonfire and then flicking a match into it.
Nope. Color Revolutions are about disrupting established politics. Political support would make it not a color revolution.
Not a glowie, transparent projection there on your part.
Yiddle me this rabbi, how did antifa keep being released, financed, supproted in congress, mayors offices, council chambers, and on media, if not for political support?
Color revolutions are not about left/right. They are about fomenting conflict between two radical factions, any two factions.
Left vs. right is the scam.
Thanks for letting me know I'm over the target though glowie.
Congratulations, you played yourself.
You should actually go and read the playbook.
Any person pushing a radical agenda could be trying to run the playbook. All I am saying is that ALL radical agenda need to be treated with suspicion.
You advocated a radical agenda and are there for deserving of scrutiny.
Any person pushing a radical agenda could be trying to run the playbook. All I am saying is that ALL radical agenda need to be treated with suspicion. You advocated a radical agenda and are there for deserving of scrutiny.
No, you were explicitly saying thats what it was.
And now you're walking it back to a softer position.
Classic pilpul, because you are a jew.
In fact I've seen this walk-back "all I'm saying is" and "could be" response too many times not to recognize it.
You jews lack the courage of your convictions.
It's why you always lose in the end. You always end up fleeing like rats.
109 -> 110.
You did it to yourselves, and continue to.
(post is archived)