Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

771

The 'left' are the foundation of the color revolution.

A color revolution requires a few key things, chief among them political support.

What happens if the left and right unite?

Political support for the agenda evaporates.

And shortly after, so does the left and political polarization.

Then the state is rudderless.

Unite on the issues, and not with the people in question.

Namely unite on the economic issues.

Not just any economic issue, a specific economic issue:

End wall street. Punish it. Bring it down.

Every other issue can be resolved later. Every other disagreement.

Wallstreet ends, the beast is dead, no more money for pushing the agenda.

Then we can correct the propaganda, correct the record, and not before.

Money and the economic system are the weakness of the media. And the media is the Core supporting pillar of the state and ALL its narratives.

The 'left' are the foundation of the color revolution. A color revolution requires a few key things, chief among them political support. What happens if the left and right unite? Political support for the agenda evaporates. And shortly after, so does the left and political polarization. Then the state is rudderless. Unite on the issues, and not with the people in question. Namely unite on the *economic* issues. Not just *any* economic issue, a *specific* economic issue: End wall street. Punish it. Bring it down. Every other issue can be resolved later. Every other disagreement. Wallstreet ends, the beast is dead, no more money for pushing the agenda. Then we can correct the propaganda, correct the record, and not before. Money and the economic system are the weakness of the media. And the media is the *Core* supporting pillar of the state and **ALL** its narratives.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (11).
[–] • 0 pt

Any person pushing a radical agenda could be trying to run the playbook. All I am saying is that ALL radical agenda need to be treated with suspicion. You advocated a radical agenda and are there for deserving of scrutiny.

No, you were explicitly saying thats what it was.

And now you're walking it back to a softer position.

Classic pilpul, because you are a jew.

In fact I've seen this walk-back "all I'm saying is" and "could be" response too many times not to recognize it.

You jews lack the courage of your convictions.

It's why you always lose in the end. You always end up fleeing like rats.

109 -> 110.

You did it to yourselves, and continue to.

[–] • 0 pt

What did I explicitly state? You are the one using pilpul tactics here by claiming I said something I did not. Your next step will be to just claim victory in the argument without any justification.

I CLARIFIED my statements because you were too stupid to understand, or more likely willfully ignored because pilpul

Color revolutions owe no allegiance to the left or to established politics. This is what you explicitly claimed and it is not true. Color revolutions only care about creating chaos. YOU advocate for chaos and as such are the only one who's actions fit the playbook here.

But go ahead and spew your Ad hominem and run away so tomorrow you can claim you 'won' this argument.