Meh, I would be considered far-right, and I fit in on Voat just fine.

The website itself may be called anarchic in structure, but those who gathered there were (or became) far-right quite frequently.

Basically anywhere that allows free speech, where all arguments and evidence can be freely examined, is likely to develop a culture that is far-right by today's standards. Leftism and the kind of 90's liberalism that passes for Centrism today are both so naive, so self-contradictory, that they can only dominate where ignorance is enforced through the censorship of competing views, counter-evidence, and criticism. Any place like Voat is bound to end up with a right-wing culture.

"Words, words, words, I'm so sick of words,
"I get words all day through, first from him now from you,
"Is that all you blighters can do?" -- My Fair Lady

What is comes down to is the difference between those who want a central government to control every aspect of our lives and enforce a code of behavior of their choosing on us;

or

those who believe that the less government, the better, and that small government is less harmful than big government, and that individuals should be free to run their own lives.

It was like /pol/. The system was anarchic but the community was right-wing.