Meh, I would be considered far-right, and I fit in on Voat just fine.

The website itself may be called anarchic in structure, but those who gathered there were (or became) far-right quite frequently.

Basically anywhere that allows free speech, where all arguments and evidence can be freely examined, is likely to develop a culture that is far-right by today's standards. Leftism and the kind of 90's liberalism that passes for Centrism today are both so naive, so self-contradictory, that they can only dominate where ignorance is enforced through the censorship of competing views, counter-evidence, and criticism. Any place like Voat is bound to end up with a right-wing culture.

It was like /pol/. The system was anarchic but the community was right-wing.

"Words, words, words, I'm so sick of words,
"I get words all day through, first from him now from you,
"Is that all you blighters can do?" -- My Fair Lady

What is comes down to is the difference between those who want a central government to control every aspect of our lives and enforce a code of behavior of their choosing on us;

or

those who believe that the less government, the better, and that small government is less harmful than big government, and that individuals should be free to run their own lives.