If you are more concerned with the thermal issue, then hold the phone 20cm away from your body. It seems the FCC is still using the Power Density (PD) rather than what your source suggests using, the Specific Absorption Rate (SAR). 5G phones will still be in compliance in regards to PD but not to SAR.
This concern is more related to the change to 5G rather than a completely new concern. The effects of electromagnetic radiation have been generally well studied, however low frequency electromagnetic radiation is less well studied, hence the justification for introducing this an emerging issue.
5G networks will soon be rolled out for mobile phone and smart device users. How exposure to electromagnetic fields could affect humans remains a controversial area, and studies have not yielded clear evidence of the impact on mammals, birds or insects. The lack of clear evidence to inform the development of exposure guidelines to 5G technology leaves open the possibility of unintended biological consequences.
Source: Section 4.4 https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/health/files/scientific_committees/scheer/docs/scheer_s_002.pdf
Reminds me of tobacco ads back in the 40/50s, when even doctors were encouraging people to smoke. They knew it would become a health issue, they just ignored it because shekels.
evidence...that is i require...there is none for 5G tech causing medical issues...yet...(it may in the future). Tobacco and climate change were covered up by their respective industries. Do there need to be more studies? Absolutely. Same thing goes for vaccines and autism. But to claim facts without evidence is beyond reason.
But to claim facts without evidence is beyond reason.
the main safety concern "is heating of the eyes and skin caused by the absorption of mmWave energy in the human body"
(post is archived)