The tactic leverages the router's beamforming tech to identify individuals with up to 99.5% accuracy, and it works with existing routers, too.
So if a random person the "researchers" didn't know walks in, it could identify them? Identify in this case is "ID someone we already know of" and not actually identify people whether they carry a spy device or otherwise.
One must consider the massive amount of this tech deployed in public places that then can be used to match that data with visual/cell/bluetooth/etc data. The net is large and cast everywhere.
One must consider the massive amount of this tech deployed in public places that then can be used to match that data with visual/cell/bluetooth/etc data. The net is large and cast everywhere.
One must also consider the amount of pilpul that the jews spread to keep people in fear and self-policing attitudes. As with most "breakthroughs", the lies are always proven not to scale into the real world. The kikes wouldn't need (((Flock cameras))) if WiFi surveillance was so good. But go ahead and (((trust))) the (((experts))). They got everything correct with the jewflu.
Why do you think 5G is such a big thing? It requires way more towers with shorter range but higher bandwidth.
That just makes it far easier to get exact locations of devices even in transit.