Deleting posts likely would only tie into Section 230 if it was selective deletion, e.g. the ideological censorship that's pervasive on Big Tech sites. If it was blanket (e.g. "No posts about tobacco"), it'd fall under common carrier the same as Fedex doesnt ship tobacco. What kind doesn't matter, the quality doesn't matter, who's doing the shipping doesn't matter, Fedex treats everyone equally in this regard.
Ahhh, thanks, that sounds a lot better. So 230 allowed editing content on the site's whim, without any published rules, i.e. Twitter, Fakebook, etc.
> Deleting posts likely would only tie into Section 230 if it was selective deletion, e.g. the ideological censorship that's pervasive on Big Tech sites. If it was blanket (e.g. "No posts about tobacco"), it'd fall under common carrier the same as Fedex doesnt ship tobacco. What kind doesn't matter, the quality doesn't matter, who's doing the shipping doesn't matter, Fedex treats everyone equally in this regard.
Ahhh, thanks, that sounds a lot better. So 230 allowed editing content on the site's whim, without any published rules, i.e. Twitter, Fakebook, etc.
Pretty much
Pretty much