No, conservativism isn't a sustainable plan for the future, it's a leash used to try to moderate societal reaction to changes in the status quo.

It's more than a bit oxymoronic but a neo-traditionalist or neotrad movement is what you would want, a way forward in bridging future technology, more efficient and beneficial social forms, into line with with traditional structures proven by millennia of social darwinism. Another way to say this would be a blending of historically rightwing and traditionalist positions with futurism(automation, AI, etc)and adaptations on these concepts made via interpreting evolutionary psychology and a more modern concept of physiological needs.

Leftwing futurism says eat bugs, and soylent green, live in the pod and take a pittance of UBI and be good cattle while we purge you down.

Rightwing futurism push to restructure the forms of our broken society to generate and maintain intergenerational wealth and more efficiently use resources by keeping tighter family groups with fewer people reliant on the state while maximizing opportunity for familial growth and enabling mixed use housing and home expansions with minimal red tape, we have enough resources for everyone to live like old money, the problem is people don't know how to get or protect those resources and they have been fooled into accepting social forms that inhibit this.

To simplify more, the leftist futurist wants to kill the family unit and replace it with nothing or the polycule the rightist futurist wants to kill the nuclear family(read: ill conceived NATO project to commodify troops and labor) and revive the traditional family.

Hello starjallo.

As long as the communists and degenerates run education, no. They will always be brainwashing and convincing children, so long as they have access, they will always have someone to brainwash.

(((futureism))) No.

What the fuck is futurism?

Nazipunk?