WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

414

It's really not engineering.

It's really not engineering.

(post is archived)

[–] 4 pts

yes, what you have to ask is if it is possible to "certify" a SW system, because that is the key role of the whole "engineer" mess.

basically, a bridge build according to regulation is deemed safe

can you do that on systems engineering ? no, not unless you basically "freeze" the tech landscape and certify it

The key point I am trying to say: You need to look beyond the simple statement, to the consequences

[–] 0 pt
[–] 0 pt

I have gray hair and around 30 years ago transputers where the thing, to be used for "formal programming"

guarantee to be provable true

obviously there is a catch, the whole issue is moved to the "specification" and that becomes another language

it is turtles all the way down

[–] 0 pt

Shit, somebody else who has used transputers. My masters was in distributed systems using transputers..